Chapter 127: How Many Physicists Does It Take To Change A Light Bulb?

by Darryl Penney

Abstract: the derivation is given of the universe and its working through ‘absolutes’ and the logical restriction that requires its expansion, the correct form of the law of gravitation, the revised structure of the photon, Euler’s equation and a new, much superior way of thinking. Physics must import the relativity of ‘new think’ [the concept] and the general mathematical physics [context] that retains top-down physics and adds to it bottom-up physics and the sideways orthogonality of the creation equation. The organisation of our civilisation and society can be accessed through physics and physics must be awakened from its slumber in spite of the natural reluctance of the establishment because organisation, and the miss-match between specialist and generalist, is the answer to civilisation’s current problems.

Keywords: ‘new think’; relativity; orthogonality; general mathematical physics; creation equation; quantum gravity

The answer is indeterminate because physicists recognise a light bulb [concept], but not how to replace it [context], and even if they got it in, it would be upside-down! Harsh words, but unfortunately true because physics is incomplete and this fact has been known [and covered up] for a hundred years, ever since Einstein added curved space and got the correct answer of twice Newton’s gravity. A simple example is the representation of the photon (Wikipedia, Light, Electromagnetic theory) and (Wikipedia, Photon, Historical development) where the electric and magnetic waves arise together and drop to zero together. How does the wave know how much energy it represents? Something is wrong! Fundamental physics has ‘crossed it’s fingers’ and waited for the answer and I believe that the following shows the way to correct this problem.

Physics is partially correct, as the diagram suggests, that electric and magnet fields are created together [because, I believe that magnetism is a logical speed control], are orthogonal (independent, equal and opposite but entangled at the origin), but when I say equal and opposite I do not mean in the mathematical sense, but equal and opposite logically and if you think, from this, that mathematics might not be complete, you would be correct. The photon is not just an electromagnetic wave, it is an energy, and physics postulates that the universe [Big Bang] and photons arise out of nothing and suddenly expand and move at the speed of light. Why does this happen? Firstly, it is due to relativity because when the universe and photon were created, something else was created at the same time and I call this ‘organisation’ and secondly, energy has to logically move at the speed of light. Immediately a problem appears because organisation is difficult to describe or even grasp and the Wikipedia entry [top-down and bottom-up organisation] ‘throws up its hands’ and begs enlightenment. However, both we and the universe use a special form of organisation called Occam’s razor and the ‘relativity’ [concept-context] of this is the principle of least action [energy] that was a big question a couple of hundred years ago and has been quietly pushed ‘out of sight’ [that light moved in a straight line]. Notice that the law of conservation of energy, that is still taught [energy cannot be created nor destroyed], is incomplete when applied to the universe, and physics, as defined by Newton and Maxwell, needs fixing before we can use a new way of thinking [‘new think’, concept] that is orthogonal to general mathematical physics [context].

No one has seriously considered how our universe is constructed, and given the energy ‘(1)’ and organisation ‘(-1)’ in the photon, a fractal can be constructed as the creation equation [(1+(-1))=0 as the form] and the logic of the half-truth [true, false, alternating true/false and chaos] as the working. Bear in mind firstly, that I am using an incomplete mathematics to express the context that is missing in physics and secondly, that the equation exists only if the universe is expanding and thirdly, the reason that the photon moves at a constant speed in a vacuum is below. For example, Euler’s equation determines the form of the universe [(e to the power i times pi +1) = 0 can be written (e to the power i times pi + e to the power 0) = 0, which is an expression of orthogonality and describes an expanding [e, simple interest expansion] sphere [pi] from 0 symmetrical [i] through the centre.

It is apparent that energy and organisation are created together’ [concept], but relativity says that they must have an entanglement [context] that allows flows from one to the other and this provides ‘choice’ and ‘action at a distance’. The movement from energy-matter to a wave [particle-wave duality] is the key to action at a distance and I call this alternation, ‘shimmer’, whereas physics is content to use an ‘energy gradient’ to determine if a reaction occurs without the organisation required to bring them together. Relativity requires a prediction [context] to the statement that I have just made [concept], so a derivation of quantum gravity and the law of gravitation is given below that also shows how easy it is ‘to change a light bulb’. Einstein was close, but he was using traditional physics, and as I have shown, it is incomplete.

Relativity is the functioning of the universe and a lack of relativity created the universe and a lack of relativity is easily created by the ratios of the dimensions [energy (E), organisation (O), time (t) and length (l) created by expansion]. The absolutes are firstly, the sum of energy and organisation is always zero [from the creation equation], secondly, energy and organisation [dark energy] are necessarily created to balance the necessary expansion of the universe [E/t+O/t, all volume], thirdly, the constant speed of light is l/t (all E and O) and fourthly, gravity [so called quantum gravity] is E/l+O/l (all t). The law of gravitation is E(mass1)/l times (for relativity) E(mass2)/l plus O(mass1)/l times (for relativity) O(mass2)/l and this shows why Einstein (eventually via curvature of space) chose twice the Newtonian value that proved correct and ‘shut down’ fundamental physics for a hundred years.

Also, organisation creates energy [and vice versa] in the form of emotion, so reorganising physics should be fun, or at least emotional! By the way, the answer to the example above can finally be given, that energy and organisation are created together [first fractal with the restriction that they be kept apart, are independent yet entangled], but the working of the universe is the logic of the half-truth [second fractal, (true, false, true-false alternating and chaos)] and so energy and organisation alternate. The absolutes define the form of the universe and relativity [non-absolutes] defines the workings logically through the logic of the half-truth and sinusoidal motion is an assumption of physics and not necessarily true in a measuring space. The form of the ‘true-false alternating’ might be a square wave of logic [on-off] and probably depends on the surroundings, as around an aerial.

Overview: physics deals with concepts in a simple way and lacks context, for example, everything appears out of ‘thin air’, such as the Big Bang. Einstein’s special theory brought context between observers under the restriction of the absolute of the constant speed of light to each observer and threw physics into a ‘tizzy’ and ‘curved space’ added the organisation that demolished Newtonian physics. The universe functions on relativity and Einstein’s context must have a concept and this letter places a ‘floor’ under the creation of all concepts and creates a complete physics, under the restriction that specialist cannot see physics’ place in a general mathematical physics.

Finally, no references are cited because everything can be derived simply from the first principles and the examples given above. However, it is pointless ‘reinventing the wheel’ and most of it will be on my website darrylpenney.com when required.