Chapter 131: Grow Up, Think Better, Live Longer and Save Civilisation!

by

Abstract: consider the relativity of: ‘Today’s problems cannot be solved with today’s mind’

Albert Einstein and many great thinkers …

(Fair Food, edited by Nick Rose, p 250)

with ‘When I was a child, I thought like a child and unfortunately, I still think the same way [top-down], and that is why the world is in such a mess. A new type of thinking, using a new software, that solves both our personal and the world’s problems, is now available.’

This paper

and the relativity of ‘Man is a rope stretched between the animal and the superman – a rope over an abyss’

Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra

(Superhuman, Rowan Hooper, p 305)

Keywords: “New Think”; relativity; quantum gravity; dark energy; Occam’s razor; principle of least action; anti-ageing; mathematics of concept-context; superman; Nietzsche

Extended abstract: “New Think” is a new type of software that can be easily used by our brain to expand our thinking in new ways and into new areas by using a more basic and complete mathematics [of concept and context] because the universe is a fractal based on a simple creation equation [(1+(-1))=0, where ‘1’ is energy and ‘(-1)’ is organisation]. For this equation to exist, the universe must expand, which creates dimensions that determine ratios [non-relativistic absolutes] that determine the structure of our universe. The absolutes are (1) a new conservation law, (2) the reason that the speed of the photon is constant to any observer, (3) the ‘infill’ dark energy of the expansion is constant per volume of space, (4) quantum gravity, and (5) the role of Occam’s razor and the principle of least action.

We have used the same top-down thinking for 3,000 million years and it doesn’t work in the world that we have made for ourselves, and it is time to manage properly. Managing in a relativistic fractal universe means using ‘New Think’ to extrapolate our thinking into the future to set attainable goals based on past ‘truths’ and this has been done using the creation equation. A test-run using “New Think” shows religion and governance as critical to society, shows the ‘message’ behind each and shows why they affect us emotionally, all as functions of the creation equation. The fractal nature of the universe explains Adam Smith’s ‘invisible hand’ and creates a necessarily bottom-up social engineering that according to Nietzsche and “New Think” demonstrates how church teaching, by possibly using a flawed Trinity, have warped the importance of the environment and led to it’s endangerment. The ‘inputs’ to the derivation of superman and a ‘super state’ [concept] as well as ‘survival of the best’ [context] are given to enable a solution, but ‘social engineering’ entails ‘free will’ and whilst religion and governance use the physical effects of the creation equation, can we ‘grow up’ and form a consensus using democracy and the market from the same equation? Finally, Descartes’ truth [I measure, therefore I am entangled] has been answered and a possible means of attaining [in loco parentis] the children’s request for a viable future through the judicial orthogonality of governance is given.

Introduction: the basic problem between the quotations is essentially moving from the thinking of a child, to a superman using “New Think” because a child guesses, an adult reasons with whatever is at hand and a ‘superman’ uses the unique “New Think”, but that has not happened because the software that we use is ‘out of date’ and inappropriate for recent history. This is a justifiable assertion because all Life uses top-down thinking, which is incomplete and arose through survival of the fittest, but “New Think” uses a double orthogonality and entanglement for completeness that allows us to define goals for our evolution knowing that they are correct. Using an example that is familiar to us, from architecture, ‘form follows function’ with restrictions [height, size etc.] and this best defines a fractal universe [form of the equation, functioning and restrictions]. Our universe has a form derived from the creation equation [(1+(-1))=0] with the functioning described by the logic of the half-truth [true, false, alternating true-false and chaos] with a number of restrictions, one being that the creation equation only exists if our universe is expanding [which it is, and we call it the Big Bang]. The Big Bang is obviously a child’s view of the above, to prove my point [energy appears from nowhere in a big bang].

Overview: a fractal is simple in construction, but complicated in appearance and this complication is the reason why science, and in particular, physics and mathematics have got it so wrong for so long, and in particular, why the problems of our civilisation are numerous. To give an example, Newton acknowledged that the law of gravity was an ‘inspired guess’ and was wrong, as found by experiment and by Einstein, as an analogy, who included the ‘guess’ of curved space, which is not allowed, as physics is based on energy [and anyway ‘curved space’ does not exist from a linear equation]. The importance of this is that fundamental physics effectively ‘shut down’ over the last century and the derivation, using “New Think” is given below and shows that “New Think” is necessary to restart fundamental physics. In a fractal, the solution to the problems that we face as individuals must have the same solution as civilisations face ,and because children dislike restrictions and find it easier to anticipate rewards [carrot and stick], so the example, below, was chosen to produce every person’s greatest desire, which is to live healthily and significantly longer than they have any right to expect from the average. This is particularly important in the case of specialists, as they pursue their specialities, below. The following example shows aspects of organisation that create restrictions, the form of the universe is derived and is shown to tally with Euler’s equation that links the mathematical constants to each other, and describes the universe. Finally, anti-ageing philosophy is defined and used as an introduction to the social engineering that is necessary to ‘Saving the World’ and restarting evolution.

An Example from Modern Life

‘Thinking’ has been around for 3,000 million years and we have evolved a brain and a mind that uses ‘software’ [necessarily top-down] that is inadequate in a modern [say 15,000 years] era and the use of this evolved version threatens our very existence. The universe, I believe, is a fractal based on relativity [see below] and it’s derivation shows a new way of thinking [concept is ‘New Think’ and it’s relativity is the context of general mathematical physics] that, in a fractal, impinges every problem that we apply it to. The ‘devil is in the detail’ and in this case, it is the ‘restrictions’, firstly, that the universe must expand to exist [we call it the Big Bang] and that democracy and money contain ‘flaws’ in their use that we currently do not understand, and yet champion, so, I will offer a simple example using ‘New Think’ as a template for all problems generated in a simple fractal.

The following four paragraphs were taken from my website [xxxxxxxxx.com] that supports the xxxxxxxxx Anti-ageing Philosophy Centre. Anti-ageing philosophy extends the work of Michael Greger [nutritionfacts.org] to include ‘New Think’, controlling population, restarting evolution and the selection of the best. A particular point is that the ‘coin of the realm’ of medicine is a ‘pill’ that trades for money from patients that continually renew their prescriptions. “New Think” suggests that a change in lifestyle can accomplish as much, if not more, more cheaply and simpler with a gain of (possibly) 25 years of healthy living above the average lifespan.

Another example of context that must be kept in mind is that ‘ground flaxseeds alone “induced one of the most potent blood-pressure-lowering effects ever achieved by a dietary intervention.”…. Ground flaxseeds may work two to three times better than these medicines, and they have only good side effects. In addition to their anticancer properties, flaxseeds have been demonstrated in clinical studies to help control cholesterol, triglyceride, and blood sugar levels; reduce inflammation, and successfully treat constipation.’ (How Not To Die, Michael Gregrer, p 133) If flax seeds are so good, why are they not universally prescribed by doctors? The answer is economic, because the structure and working of medicine requires funding and, as above, doctors, in general, need constant customers to support their practice and the pills that they prescribe cost money that flows to the drug companies. The philosophy of anti-ageing and lifestyle is to provide knowledge that allows us to make informed choices.

‘If nitrate-rich vegetables can so powerfully modulate humanity’s leading risk factor for dying, why did it take until 2015 before such a study was published? Well, who was going to fund it? Big Beetroot? ‘The “veggie Viagra” effect…. There’s a link between vegetable consumption and improved sexual function, as well as improved blood flow to the most important organ in the body, the brain.’ (p 138) The study had to wait on ‘charities like the British Heart Foundation, which finally funded a beetroot juice study involving people with high blood pressure.’ (p 137)

Clearly, as the case of flax seeds and beetroot have shown, we are being manipulated by Big Medicine and Big Pharmaceuticals, and it may be necessary for us to accept this manipulation to get the medical service that we demand, and that service is a product of the current state of thinking. However, if we use “New Think”, we can manipulate the system to our own advantage and it is not difficult to (possibly) gain an extra 25 years of life because my doctor said that based on my test results, I was (effectively) 25 years younger than my chronological age.

To ‘ lose weight, reduce your salt intake, get more exercise, and eat healthier’ are all concepts without the contexts and relativity requires both because the working of the universe is relativity and the structure of the universe is a ‘lack’ of relativity. Thus the concept of anti-ageing philosophy is orthogonal [independent, yet entangled] to the context ‘state of mind, nutrition and exercise’ and this entangling of everything produces the difficulty in understanding. This context, in a fractal, becomes concepts that are entangled [state of mind, nutrition and exercise] and we need to consider each concept together with its contexts. For example, to change our nutrition, or exercise, we need to change the state of our mind.

A hundred years ago, a decision was made to move Western medicine into its present form of medical practitioners prescribing pills that were provided by pharmaceutical companies and away from the difficult to regulate herb based medicine. This was done for a number of reasons including the profit motive and (possibly) away from the benefits to the consumer. This divide is the difference between Western and Eastern medicine and anti-ageing philosophy is an attempt to take the best parts of each system for the consumers’ benefit that leads to a long healthy life through state of mind, nutrition and exercise.

In a fractal universe all problems use the same procedure, but the problem is to see that solution, and obviously a complete mathematics is needed, that I call the mathematics of concept-context. Change is difficult in the established, so, I picked a (possible) solution that might tempt people to take ‘Saving the World’ seriously by providing a solution that may extend their lives into ‘troubled times’ because extending life is the last thing that an over-populated world needs. So, let’s use the above solution on the present population to reduce population numbers (willingly), restart evolution and save the environment. In other words, Nietzsche’s quotation is both apt and attainable, but it will have to be left to the prediction below.

The Restrictions and Functioning of the Universe

The functioning of the universe is described by the logic of the half-truth [true, false, alternating true-false and chaos] simply because a functioning system requires ‘choice’ to determine whether a reaction occurs and that requires presenting the choice at each opportunity. This is not a trivial observation because it describes the formation of the photon. The photon must present as a wave and as a particle alternately to see if a reaction occurs [notice that the waveform is square and logically switched, not sinusoidal as physics imagines]. I say this with certainty because absolute (5) [Occam’s razor and principle of least action] requires a unique answer, which is only possible for fast alternation [so often that there can be no alternative]. This combination of wave-particle is well known as the wave-particle duality [the fractal nature of the universe] that was ‘glossed over’ by physics as both wave and particle are energy without considering the organisational ramifications, above. In fact, the application of the logic of “New Think” explains the simple relationships upon which physics is built, in particular, the Planck relationship that energy is proportional to frequency and Einstein’s relationship that energy is proportional to mass. The simplicity of the equations suggests that they describe an orthogonality [energy-organisation] or state [energy and mass as a ‘condensation’ of energy] respectively.

The wave-particle duality is part of the physics of the universe, but “New Think” [concept] has the orthogonal general mathematical physics [as context] and is the double orthogonal with entanglement [top-down of science, the bottom-up of the physical and the sideways of relativity], so, another restriction appears of which universities are apparently unaware [silo effect]. It is simply that specialist and generalists think differently because their knowledge base is different. This could apply to everyone in the population, but it can become serious at a government level, as in the Bay of Pigs fiasco, where an investigation advised that other specialists act as generalists, which is not the best solution. The generalist-specialist divide becomes worse as we learn more and specialists must work with generalists [to add completeness and relativity] and this is especially relevant to universities where the only generalist tends to be the vice-chancellor. If an example need be given, this paper shows why it is (possibly) necessary to entice specialists, who tend to be interested only in their speciality, to read this by offering longer life-times.

Two other restrictions appear in the consideration of concepts that we hold dear, firstly, democracy that we call our political system that suffers from the problems shown in the previous paragraph [specialist-generalist duality] as well as allowing all adults an equal vote and secondly, the market place. These two ‘institutions’ of choice are long-lived [truths] because they use the mathematics of concept-context based on the creation equation, where the mind rates the context of a number of concepts as an aid to choosing [Fynman’s ‘histories’ of quantum mechanics is similar]. Another restriction, that comes out of the example above, is that our genes change slowly and are suited to the hunter-gatherer lifestyle, and yet we have changed to a ‘modern’ lifestyle without considering the problems associated with that change. Our society, that is essentially unplanned, buffeted by technology and treats the environment as a ‘common’ needs to be brought under control and the means is in “New Think” because the answers must come from the creation equation. The reference to the market and democracy, that are ‘truths’ [by residing in the creation equation], hold the key to remaking our society in a responsible manner,providing that we recognise the restrictions.

The Form of the Universe

Traditional science requires references to build on previous work [to create an absolute], but clearly, everything must depend on the absolutes that strip out relativity. These five absolutes appear strange because they are products of necessity, for example, (2) that the speed of light is constant to any observer, irrespective of their motion [Michelson-Morley experiment], a fact that turned physics ‘on it’s head’ a hundred years ago [distance/time, all energy and organisation]. (1) from the creation equation, the conservation law that the sum of energy and organisation is zero, and note that energy can increase, as long as organisation does also [an example is a spring – Hooke’s law]. (3) that energy plus organisation per volume is constant, for all time [result of constant expansion], (4) that energy and organisation divided by distance is constant [quantum gravity], for all time, and (5) Occam’s razor and principle of least action define uniqueness by being minima [if not minima, the system does not exist].

Notice that quantum gravity is hyperbolic [(energy plus organisation) divided by separation, for all time], whereas the attraction of gravity requires relativity that produces the inverse square of the separation:

E(mass1)/l times (for relativity) E(mass2)/l plus O(mass1)/l times (for relativity) O(mass2)/l

where E is energy, l is length, O is organisation for all time.

The structure of the universe is derived from the creation equation and can also be described by the enigmatic Euler’s equation that determines the form of the universe [(e to the power i times pi +1) = 0 can be written (e to the power i times pi + e to the power 0) = 0, which is an expression of orthogonality and describes an expanding [e, simple interest expansion] sphere [pi] from 0 symmetrical [i] through the centre]. Clearly, the universe is not speeding-up, nor slowing down and space is not ‘curved’. I have always found Euler’s equation enigmatic because it contains ‘i’ explicitly, but as can be seen from the ‘organisational expansion’, ‘i’ must be there because it represents relativity [through the centre] and everything, except the absolutes, is relative to something else as stated in the creation equation.

Conclusion: organisation can pose problems and this is (presumably) the reason that it’s use is restricted [not made explicit] in Newtonian physics, whereas the universe only exists when absolute (5) exists. “New Think” is the concept and general mathematical physics is the context and the context is like organisation, but uses orthogonalities to link the mind/brain and the physical, relativity, as well as absolute (5) to define a minimum value. Euler’s equation is used by traditional mathematics to show the relationship between the mathematical constants [though it appears enigmatic] and the equation contains the physics of the universe, as described above, thus, the use of the words ‘general mathematical physics’ does seem appropriate.

Children are marching in the streets wanting politicians to safeguard their future, school shootings abound and jails are full because we do not engineer society [and necessarily people]. We pay welfare and provide basic support systems to the needy, but we do not approach the problem in an organised way. We are like children that react, not think, about situations and we cannot think properly unless we use “New Think” to determine truths on which to base our choices, so, this is the moment in time for science to promote the ‘rallying call’ of a solution to all problems because “New Think” is the only way that we will grow-up and solve the mess that we are in.

Prediction (as a relativity): I have seen the question asked ‘Is the universe mathematical?’ and now that question can be answered fully. Given that the creation equation [(1+(-1))=0] appears (traditionally) mathematical [as a triviality], and there is the physical case where ‘+’ is determined to be any relationship, however, the mind uses (a+b)=0 for all a, b and so anything is possible, but of more interest is the mathematics of concept-context that applies a value to the concepts a and b in order for the mind to make choices. This is where democracy, markets, governance and social engineering appear, so the universe is mathematical [using concept-context] and traditional mathematics is only a special case of the number line, not the orthogonal, and is a more complicated concept. In other words, fundamental physics and traditional mathematics are incomplete and full of enigmas, whereas literature, that uses concept-context as its basis, is where we find “New Think” occurring in isolated ideas throughout history. These notable ideas are the ‘cream’ of humanity’s [top-down] thinking, but being top-down, have never been brought together, until now, through “New Think”.

Anti-ageing Philosophy and Organisation

Quotations tend to ‘hang around’, probably because they contain elements of ‘truth’, which is the foundation of organisation and Descartes’ ‘I think, therefore I am’ is pertinent to the above because it says ‘I measure, so I am entangled with the universe’ in “New Think” and so, is true [entanglement and the act of measurement creates the universe to the measurer] and further, we have to thank Descartes for the concept of Cartesian coordinates that explain orthogonality, to some extent. Nietzsche’s quotation is appropriate to our (possible) destruction [abyss] of the planet and ourselves and contains a relativity that requires an explanation of anti-ageing philosophy [context] and its goal [superman]. This relativity between animals and supermen, in modern language is our moving out of survival of the fittest with it’s strict limitations on behaviour sanctioned by limited resources and hunger into the unregulated bounty of farming practices that allowed more population and this unregulated population growth has caused the present day problems of global warming, pressure on resources etc. The concept of superman is the goal that relativity says that we have to have, whether we realise it or not, but we stumble along [as children] without acknowledging controls or goals.

Superman is a concept and that tells us very little about what type of superman we need. The concept needs a context [organisation] that I call survival of the best, and we have to determine the context ourselves, so we need a complete mathematics to do that. This simple example shows that organisation is the important part, and yet traditional physics rejects it. That is why physics must be rebuilt as general mathematical physics. At the moment, the structure of fundamental physics is child-like, starting with the Big Bang and having to double the effect of Newton’s law of gravity [exactly double for curved space, based on an analogy!]. ‘Anti-ageing philosophy’ is the banner, as unlikely as it sounds, that leads us to plan for our individual future and, at the same time, plan society’s future because we live in a fractal. The fractal nature of the universe explains Adam Smith’s the ‘invisible hand’, that the actions of the individual and society are intimately related through the creation equation. ‘”The Wealth of Nations” (1776) , represents the beginning of modern economics or political economy – even he was so thrilled by the recognition of an order in the economic system that he proclaimed the mystical principle of the “invisible hand”: that each individual in pursuing his own selfish good was led, as if by an invisible hand, to achieve the best good of all, so that any interference with free competition by government was almost certain to be injurious.’ (Wikipedia)

In a fractal, as is our universe, an othogonality can be created, such as anti-ageing philosophy, from the recognised Western and Eastern medicines with the aid of “New Think” and thus becomes a new, alternate path for our society. We need a path [context] mid-way between these two extremes of Eastern and Western medicine and I call it anti-ageing philosophy that dips into each as needed, but we need to define a goal to aim for [concept] and that goal is survival of the best. The above shows the organisation that is needed [market, democracy and choice through the mathematics of concept-context] to change society to implement eugenics (willingly), restart evolution, set goals for society and engineer personalities. It is not difficult, but we have to use “New Think” to arrive at truths and use a mathematics on which to base organisation, but new problems are arising with unregulated economic migration threatening the developed countries. Plans must be made, and using the wrong organisation allows for a fiasco such as occurred in the Bay of Pigs invasion.

Test-driving ‘New Think’

‘“New Think” is the tool that generalists need to save the world from the specialists’

Traditional mathematics and physics describe ‘how’ things work, but “New Think” describes ‘why’ everything works. “New Think” is completely different and needs an example to be given of how it works because having reached this point, the new soft-ware of your thinking has been loaded without you realising. I am making a point of this because our brains have developed over 3,000 million years and suddenly we are changing the way that we think and a little ‘test-run’ could be fun and shows that ‘New Think’ has the ‘grunt’ that I am promising. It doesn’t matter what I choose because the universe is entangled and everywhere is accessible, and so, I have to be careful to restrict the scope of examples. I will choose the current topics that newspapers are running, that firstly, children in the United States are asking the government to safeguard them at school from ‘school shootings’, secondly, children are marching to ask politicians to preserve their future from global warming, species loss, environmental degradation etc.

Clearly, the government has no useful contribution to make as they have not been able to get the world to work properly and I believe that the only people that can change the world, is you and I using ‘New Think’. In both cases the children are being manipulated by adults that have an agenda of their own and it is undoubtedly, to their mind, a worthwhile project, but they, like the government do not have an answer and are effectively having a tantrum, just as children do. One solution bandied about is restrictions on guns, and Australia went down this path, pushed by an opportunistic Prime Minister and the country is now vulnerable, whereas, a little thought shows that it is co-workers or classmates that actually do the shootings, and it is their exclusion, bullying, ridicule etc. that is causing the problem and the extreme reaction. If everyone adhered to the golden rule [Do to others as you would have them do to you] and were nice to each other, problems like this would not occur. In other words, the students and workers have brought these attacks on themselves and the solution is to ‘love your neighbour’. The ‘invisible hand’ of economics [nature of a fractal] ensures that the behaviour in the classroom is carried through into later life and forms the basis of society.

The golden rule seems to be a simple solution, but everything in the universe is simple and the major religions are built on this simple idea and call it ‘love your neighbour’. “New Think” allows us to understand how religions operate and religions are effective because they use the creation equation and the (1) absolute [energy (as emotion) must equal organisation] to create a mystique around the religion by using a bible of stories, hymns, teachings, rituals, vast cathedrals, churches, robes and other organisations that create energy, in the form of emotion, in their followers [when measuring by sight, sound or imagination]. This emotional energy adds organisation in the form of the Church’s teaching to their daily lives and everyone benefits because the universe is a fractal. Religion is widespread and is one of mankind’s greatest achievements in creating an orthogonality to the savagery of the time that transforms the golden rule into institutions that have lasted for thousands of years. Whilst religion is an orthogonality and has brought great benefits, it is necessarily top-down and has done little to help other areas, such as the environment, though there is speculation that the Holy Spirit was originally the environment, was ‘lost’ through lack of use, and forms a Trinity with God the creator [energy, atoms] and the Son as love [context, organisation] in the community.

It is well known that every tribe has a ‘creation myth’, presumably to add relativity to their existence, but the concept of the golden rule, as lying behind all religions [in a social sense], provides a unifying factor that all religions can accept, as well as atheists. In other words, the form of “New Think”, as would be expected in a fractal, is the same in all cases, and in this particular case, the various religions [like academic disciplines] are top-down, the golden rule is the bottom-up truth [like the creation equation] and the relativity is between the religions with their restrictions. It is important to realise that nothing has changed, for the religions, except that our concept of a consolidated religion [in “New Think”] allows us to measure the effectiveness of each organisation that civilises the population and is necessary to any definitive form of social engineering.

The (partial) answer is more religion in schools and workplace, not just to reduce shootings, but to make a better more loving society. However, the structure of society must work the other way [relativity] and reduce the mental and psychological problems that result in shootings and that requires organising the epigenetic base of society. Epigenetics is the organisation that is orthogonal to the genes [energy] and is influenced by the conditions experienced by the child in society and turns genes on and off as needed to help the child best cope with its life. The home-life and upbringing create the adult and problems are carried into the community unless they are ‘nipped in the bud’. The poor, sick and those with personality problems need to be eliminated and the means used in the past have caused concern, but social engineering can achieve this without problems. Social engineering, is a top-down organisation of society that uses relativity as well as the bottom-up creation equation with restrictions, such as, that a person’ genes be removed from the gene pool voluntarily. Perhaps social engineering is “New Think”’s answer to the eugenics of a hundred years ago, done properly and further, defines a science far removed from the current propaganda.

Governance, personal life and religion are very similar because the same energy-organisation creation simply explains emotion from viewing art, architecture, beauty, listening to music etc. as well as the laughter that comes at the punchline when the organisation within the joke is simplified. In particular, the golden triangle [in mathematics] and the Mona Lisa [in art] have long been enigmatic in that they create emotion, presumably because of their underlying organisation. Music is the emotional energy derived from hearing [measuring] the organisation of the notes and our octave became an absolute from being half or double the length of a vibrating string and one third, two thirds etc. make up the division within the octave [notes]. Notice that the ratios destroy relativity [create absolutes] in music and also that literally everything can be derived from the five absolutes and thus shows how incomplete is our present science. “New Think” uses orthogonalities to link the various parts of general mathematical physics together to complete our understanding, such as religion and state above, but it can not answer whether religion came from man or God [God must be external to the universe to create it].

Religion and state are essentially the same in that they use organisation, flags and monumental buildings to generate emotion in their adherents and citizens, and relativity is achieved by creating Satan, in Christianity, and jail, or execution for the state [treason: the crime of betraying one’s country, especially by attempting to kill or overthrow the sovereign or government]. In particular, the golden rule gives us a ‘measuring stick’ to rate the effectiveness of religions and governments around the world by their effect on their citizens, whether excess populations through lack of leadership or religious dogma, enslaved populations by dictators, lack of success with global warming, population control, terrorism and so on. Finally, one world government seems to be ideal, but relativity says that it is unstable in function, as we see Britain breaking away from the Common Market and presumably reforming the Commonwealth.

The second example, contains elements of the first example, but is more complicated in that the overall structure must follow ‘truths’ from evolution as well as the market and democracy from the creation equation. The above has, I believe, laid out the ingredients and method for attaining a superman and a super-state [which must go together in a fractal] and that derivation will have to wait until required, BUT, we have to decide what form we want it to be.

Conclusion to the example: the use of “New Think” is necessary to organise the unrestrained plethora of products of the specialists that have produced technology if we want to preserve our planet and civilisation and it is with satisfaction that religion, emotion, society etc. can be brought together into a general mathematical physics. Further, our movement from survival of the fittest has a recognisable orthogonal in Nietzsche’s superman [the concept of the context of survival of the best]. The form of the ‘best’ must use the mathematics of concept-context that we know as the market and democracy to ‘price’ alternatives if we are to make choices, and choices must be made in order to bring civilisation under control because traditional science is incomplete and not up to the job.

Prediction to the example: it is also with satisfaction that I am able to answer the concept of ‘resistance to change’, a truth in organisation because seaweeds and coral attach to rocks and it is their offspring that are the agent of change. “New Think” is very accommodating and the paper above details the derivation for those that want it, the last section for those that want to see how it affects their daily lives and the unanswered example is unanswered, not because it is difficult, quite the contrary, but because of a truth that ‘you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink’. This truth says that if a number of people are prepared to consider a solution, I will present my version. Childish thinking has sought the benefits of the Second Coming for thousands of years, and yet, a version of it could be at hand, NOW, for us, I believe, using “New Think”.

I believe that a fractal universe based on the creation equation allows us to (somewhat) replicate a Second Coming by using the social engineering that “New Think” permits. This is indicated by general mathematical physics deriving the correct form of the law of gravitation, for the first time ever, above. Nietzsche wrote over a hundred years ago citing the relativity of the ‘Christian escape from this world also required the invention of an immortal soul separate from the earthly body’ with the ‘Ubermensch grasps the earthly world with relish and gratitude’. (Wikipedia, Ubermensch) Further, ‘the adjective übermenschlich means super-human: beyond human strength or out of proportion to humanity’ and it is unlikely that he would have contemplated “New Think” that allows us to maintain the physical whilst speedily transforming the mental processing through software to produce the organisation of social engineering. However, it is pleasing that it seems as if Nietzsche was trying to recreate the Trinity, above, in his philosophising and that “New Think” can absorb and explain historical ‘break-throughs’ of thinkers such as Nietzsche and Adam Smith.

Afterword: Governance and religion are similar, but orthogonal, and are bound by law and morals and as civilisation is facing a future brought about by governance’s lack of governing and (arguably) by the Church misconstruing the Trinity and teaching that the plundering of the environment was moral, children are demanding action as they have a right [and a truth] under in loco parentis. The right and truth is that parents help children (and not vice versa) and as governance has a trinity, as would be expected in a fractal [government, judiciary and police], appealing to the government (and people) is pointless [they have not solved the problem] so the path, I believe, should be through the judiciary that has the power to direct the government. The relevant law is part 2.

‘The term in loco parentis, Latin for “in the place of a parent” refers to the legal responsibility of a person or organization to take on some of the functions and responsibilities of a parent. Originally derived from English common law, it is applied in two separate areas of the law.

First, it allows institutions such as colleges and schools to act in the best interests of the student as they see fit, although not allowing what would be considered violations of the students’ civil liberties.

Second, this doctrine can provide a non-biological parent to be given the legal rights and responsibilities of a biological parent if they have held themselves out as the parent.’ (Wikipedia)

I maintain that both the government and Church have declared [Trinity] and acted as parents [social security handouts] and that the judiciary can direct and award damages for both organisations neglecting to provide adequately for the children’s future, or actively harming the environment, as given in the predictions of this paper. Clearly, the Church should change the Trinity and governments should pursue the ultimate solution of controlling and improving population by publicising the [unanswered] solution, above, for comment.

References: traditional science is built on references to previous work that are considered an ‘absolute’, and therein is the problem that this paper points out, that there are no references because science ‘got it wrong’ and the true absolutes are as above.