Chapter 116: Getting Rid of Enigmas

Energy Organization Entanglement

1. (1) (-1) relativity

Results: the operator “+” may be any that can be thought of: +, and, true etc. because our mind/brain uses a probability space (a+b)=1 that allows all a, b as long as they total 1. I call (1+(-1))=0 the creation equation because it allows two independent quantities to be created from nothing and in the physical sense there are only energy and organization at this level.

2. (1+(-1))=0 logic of the half-truth orthogonality

Results: relativity is the basic, all pervading concept that everything is relative to something else and this shows why, I believe that basic mathematics books show the operators i, e, pi, log etc. as sums of infinite series. In other words, I believe that they show that a concept [i, e, pi, log etc.] must equate to the entanglement with everything in accordance with the general statement of relativity.

The logic of the half-truth is true, false, both true and false at the same time and, whilst it is never true in the physical sense, it is very true in our mind/brain A simple example is that ‘it is not raining today’, but this is (probably) false because it is (probably) raining somewhere. This opens the way to the question of choice and how to choose if we, or any physical thing, shall do something and, of course, the mind/brain evolved for us to make better choices because a measuring space is a ‘choice’ space [+, and, true etc.]. Taking this to its logical conclusion, it could be said that we are ‘the most likely result of an infinity of choices since the universe began’ and this could be the definition of evolution [as a truth].

Whatever we do, Newtonian physics, philosophy and traditional mathematics cannot be ‘done away with’ in any sense [too useful, widespread use, single communication etc.], but must be built into a new general mathematical physics and, at least for the generalist, the present distinctions [physics, philosophy and mathematics] must be ignored. In general, the academic divisions, and especially inside universities [of ‘siloing’ departments] has slowed research for thousands of years. In other words, as I am hoping to prove, and as shown by the creation equation, generalists are as important as specialists and both are needed to progress. Generalists and specialists are orthogonal, independent in their contribution and both are necessary to research. This is hard to contemplate, but, in the limit, the specialist knows everything about nothing and the generalist knows nothing about everything.

3. energy inertia action at a distance

principle of least action

conservation of energy

the Big Bang

relativity

Newtonian physics and traditional mathematics will always be used because they align with the way that we see the world and the mathematics of concept/context should transform philosophy by linking it to the practical. However, there are problems because Newtonian physics is not based on the physical, but is a theory developed in our minds and, now that bottom-up is realized, there are apparent problems. For example, there is no reason given for action at a distance, whereas the theory presented here shows that every point is entangled,

Another enigma carries on from the last paragraph, and if the universe is a fractal, everything in it reflects the creation equation and Euler’s equation is no exception. In Euler’s equation [e power i times pi plus 1 = 0], when rearranged and e power 0 replaces 1, the equation becomes an orthogonality equation that could be thought of as a fractal entangled with the creation equation. “Pi” is a circle/sphere operator and logically a mathematical construction like a point or circle could not exist [infinitely small/thin], but the surface of a sphere could exist [Big Bang] and that the creation equation only exists if the sphere is expanding. The “e” is given in elementary textbooks as the growth of money under compound interest and this aptly describes the necessary [constant] expansion of the universe from the creation equation with time and compounding rate as absolutes. The “i” is an unexpected term that makes Euler’s equation so fearsome, and yet it has a logical simplicity as an orthogonality that must be there. The question is often asked ‘what happened before the Big Bang?’. The “i” provides the answer and it must be there to add completeness [relativity] to the equation because the opposite [orthogonality] to the universe is imaginary and if it is to be explored further, it must be a ‘mirror image’ orthogonality through the centre [because everything is relative]. Euler derived the equation mathematically, so it must be true, but the explanation of its form has not been explained until now.

Firstly, action at a distance is possible in a measuring space because every point in the space is accountable

The above is a taste of bottom-up organization together with the sideways orthogonality that can be combined with traditional top-down science to make a general mathematical physics [that includes philosophy through the mathematics of concept/context]. In other words, general mathematical physics must be of this form because the sideways orthogonality is written in the creation equation and the vertical is marrying the mind/brain [probability space, Newtonian physics] with the organizational physics that describes the universe [measuring space]

The most obvious enigma is the night sky with its myriad of suns that we call stars and we explain them by the enigma of a gigantic explosion of energy that suddenly appeared. It’s a nice creation myth

It would be nice if my derivation of everything, below, was generally accepted by the major aspects of Academia, namely as general mathematical physics by philosophy. mathematics and physics, but acceptance is a slow process. However, what would acceptance mean to the questions bandied about ‘are new universes continually being hived off?, with or without different physical constants. The difference of opinion between Einstein and Bohr of what type of space we live in, that shut down fundamental modern physics

[http://bostonreview.net/science-nature-philosophy-religion/tim-maudlin-defeat-reason]

for a hundred years. Newtonian physics was a theory that Newton knew was incomplete because he studied diffraction and could not account for its effect, but from bottom-up a theory is transformed into a reality that answers every question.

In the beginning there was nothing (0) and it is a property of orthogonality to make two independent things, but entangled [at the origin], such as (1) and (-1) [first fractal] and that forces the second fractal (1+(-1))=0 [this equation I call the creation equation because it yields the form of the universe] and it’s orthogonal is the logic of the half-truth [true, false, both true and false simultaneously] that yields ‘physical choice’ [shimmer presents opportunities for a reaction through the wave/particle duality] that leads to the working of the universe. Life employs a mind/brain to make better choices based on the structure of the probability equation [mathematics of concept/context] in the brain as well as thought [(-1), organization] from the burning of a simple sugar [(1), glucose]. That is the answer to the quotation, above, but with a ‘twist’ because Life uses a probability space [(a+b)=1] that is similar to the measuring space [(1+(-1))=0], but allows all concepts a, b to be considered.

Notice that the creation equation exits only if (1) and (-1) are kept apart and this logic requires an expanding universe, which we have [Big Bang], and this expansion produces the dimensions of space-time, energy and organization. The equation also says that everything is relative to something else, with no exceptions, except that ratios naturally become absolutes and they are the conservation of (total) energy/organization [energy/time], constant speed of light [distance/time], dark energy [energy/space] and gravity [energy/separation] and this becomes the principle of relativity in a measuring space [and replaces the present one that the laws of physics are the same in constantly moving frames]. The absolutes produce stability – the first leads to Occam’s razor and the principle of least action, the second to the constant [to the measurer, Michelson-Morley] speed of light, the third to the infill energy/organization [dark energy] to balance the expanding energy/organization of the universe and the fourth to gravity.

The limitations of Newtonian physics have made gravity an enigma for a long time and I believe, it is not an attraction [Newton], not ‘bent’ space that introduced organization and shut down modern physics for a hundred years [Einstein, deflection of a photon by a solar mass], but simply an absolute [energy-organization/distance], where all matter is composed of energy and organization and the doubling effect that Einstein (eventually) found is due to relativity where:

E(1)/d times E(2)/d plus O(1)/d times O(2)/d where E is energy, O is organization and d is the separation of two masses (1) and (2).

This leads to twice the Newtonian value where only energy is considered and is in line with Einstein’s finding. Notice that this is the first time that Newton’s law of gravitation has been derived because Newton used an ‘inspired guess’ and Einstein used an ‘analogy’. This statement is too simple to be called a derivation, it is a result of relativity and the equation only exist because of relativity.