Chapter 95: The Organization and Software behind the Mind and Abstract Thought

by Darryl Penney

Abstract: the mind/brain is a wondrous computer that is based on the physical structure of the universe as well as an extra dimension created by Life and is vastly different in hardware and software to the electronic computer that we all use although both computers are similar in their end result. The definition of the Mind is the organizational orthogonality of the energy consumed in the brain and the basis of the Mind/brain is the mathematics of concept/context that is based on the probability space (a+b)=1 for measurement/record a, b. The derivation of abstract thought in Life is concept/forward-planning/quest/relevance/beauty/context and a decision/choice/orthogonality, where all thought is based on the ‘new’ logic that is derived from and contains the top-down/bottom-up orthogonality of Newtonian and organizational physics. All terms have been derived bottom-up except for ‘forward-planning’ (and Newtonian physics) that is particular to Life and evolved as part of ‘survival of the fittest’ and it is the generality of measurement [a] and record [b] in a measurement [probability] space (a+b)=1 that allows the thoughts of Life to be ‘rich’ by accessing the plane between the physical orthogonals that are used by shimmer to provide choice.

The Mind has intrigued people for a long time, but now, using the ‘new’ mathematics and the ‘new’ physics, the (apparent) enigma of the Mind, I believe, can be shown in its simplicity and the following is presented as an example to show how applicable are the ‘new’ mathematics and the ‘new’ physics to the enigmas in Newtonian physics. The only difficulty might be for readers to accept that specialists [concept] are completely different [orthogonal] to the generalist [context] across a university, or other organizations, and the fact that generalists do not exist, in any significant number, shows the failing of the current university system. Examining the structure of the Mind will also require a reappraisal of Newtonian physics, ‘everyday’ logic and traditional mathematics because they are incomplete and based on top-down guesswork. To repeat, the following is extremely simple, but your Mind will be changed due to plasticity, as well as the much more difficult decision to accept the proposition that organization is equally as important as the energy that is the basis of Newtonian physics.

The definition of the Mind [concept] is the organizational orthogonality of the energy input/consumed in the brain and the basis [context] of the Mind/brain is the mathematics of concept/context that is based on the probability space (a+b)=1, where a and b are measurement/records and the logic evolves as we use orthogonality to view the null space as/through a fractal/probability space.

This definition has been presented here because the concepts will be considered through the contexts that will range universe-wide because the Mind is extremely simple in structure and operation and parallels the formation of the universe. I can say this because (literally) everything is based on orthogonality. Concept and context are independent/orthogonal and require two views, such as specialist and generalist because everything is based on two options and that shows the inherent fundamentality of orthogonality.

A. Orthogonality is a simplification of Cartesian coordinates in that only the axes are used and it is a separation of everything into two independent parts and in words, we are always presented with the triplet of ‘do this’ AND ‘do that’ or ‘do nothing’, which is the typical fractal and explains the enigmatic doublets and triplets of subatomic particles. Orthogonality offers choice in the physical universe by shimmering between the two axes of orthogonality, whereas Life has created a new dimension for itself by using the mind/brain to access the ‘plane’ between the orthogonals.

B. ‘We seem to have rambled high and low, far and wide because choice is so basic. Firstly, choice is not liked by traditional mathematics as evidenced by the problems with Zermelo’s Axiom of Choice and small wonder, because we can now recognise that it is not mathematical. By this statement, I mean that it is not part of the fifth dimension (a +/and b)=1, nor is it physical or logical, nor is it totally fractal, but it is part of orthogonality that precedes all of these and is truly fundamental.’ (chapter 94)

The fifth dimension (a +/and b)=1 is the orthogonalization of the property of a probability space because a probability space is a measuring space that we have to use to examine our universe that requires conservation of total energy, which I believe is zero [for simplicity]. Zero energy orthogonizes to energy (positive) and organization (negative), to use common terms, or, energy and quantum gravity in terms of physics.

C. ‘Viewing our universe through a fractal/probability space explains the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics, the weirdness of relativity, the fractal nature of the stars and subatomic particles, the nature of the mind, how the atom is produced, quantum gravity and so on.’ (chapter 94) Organizational physics is the organization behind physics and Newtonian physics is lacking a formal appreciation of organization, and, even worse, the organization that it uses is top-down. Clearly, from an organizational point of view, bottom-up is superior and, in particular, I believe that the probability space is (a+b)=1, where a and b are general measurement/record, but the space contains (literally) nothing, unless we separate/orthogonate it into two parts and nothing [0, zero] can orthogonate to 1 and –1 [the creation equation is (1+(-1))=0], if they are kept apart and for that to occur, the universe continually needs to expand. Also, the spherical expansion of the universe is the simplest solution to the enigma that everything in the universe is ‘fleeing’ from us and to do so requires that space and energy be continually created [dark energy].

Traditional physics is littered with enigmas, ‘but why we should be living here at a particular time in the universe’s history when dark energy is relatively benign and balancing out gravity is more than lucky.’ (50 Physics Ideas, Joanne Baker, p 203) Yes, it is more than lucky, it is the organization of the universe and I have called the creation of the universe the Big Whoosh (as opposed to the Big Bang), but it is just a fractalization of two types of energy and not the spectacular speculative/supposed Big Bang.

D. Newtonian physics considers one energy only and the driver is towards the lowest energy state, but this method leaves enigmas in its wake, such as diffraction that Newton was unable to explain, without considering the entanglement of (1 and (-1))=0 [quantum gravity]. Physical choice involves ‘shimmer’, that is the oscillation between the orthogonals to produce options/choice, such as the wave/particle duality and the creation of virtual/orthogonal particles (chapter 94). The Mind exercises ‘free will’ [general a and b] based on the mathematics of concept/context that is a sixth dimension using forward planning in the predator/prey interaction of the survival of the fittest.

E. Newtonian physics calls both 1 and (-1) energy and does not differentiate, whereas I am calling 1, energy, and (-1), organization [employing common terms] because they are independent (obviously) and quantum gravity is the (-1) component that is the attraction/entanglement [hyperbola of the form y=1/x] between organization depending on the separation stretching from binding forces in the nucleus to gravitational forces between the stars and galaxies. Obviously we cannot examine a space of nothing, but (1+(-1))=0 is also the equation of the orthogonals, a probability space and a fractal space. A glance at the night sky or a consideration of the subatomic particles shows that our universe is a fractal and the ability to measure across a probability space provides the accountability for the total energy [zero].

The equation (1+(-1))=0 is only stable if 1 and (-1) do not meet and the simplest way to accomplish this physically and logically is, if everything is expanding and always expanding, so the dimensions are x, y, z for space, that is expanding, positive time passing to account for the expansion, and ‘nothing’. ‘Nothing’ reminds me of a perpetual motion machine where the energy is ‘nothing’ in total, but splits into two parts and the machine runs on one part. This is what Newtonian physics is doing, but the universe is expanding and produces energy [dark energy] to balance the increasing potential energy of the expansion [quantum gravity]. Thus the number of physical dimensions is four, five or six depending on the view, but I prefer the usefulness of considering (a+b)=1 to be the same as energy/organization because it links the four parts of energy/organization/measurement/entanglement together through an orthogonality.

This orthogonality of the fifth dimension is (a +/and b)=1, where a and b are general measurement/record and the mathematics of concept/context can be derived from it, simply by sight, when it is explained, and this is the mathematics that the mind is based on. Yes, the organizational construction of our mind is based on the dimensions of our universe and that organization is ‘thought’ that is produced as we produce/change energy in the brain. Further, the logic that our mind uses must be organizational physics, above, to make the best/correct decisions, but Newtonian physics is based on energy and (reluctantly) uses organization on occasion and even worse, Newtonian physics is top-down and the logic is necessarily flawed, whereas organizational physics is bottom-up and, being derived from the dimensions, is correct/appropriate.

The mind is an enigma to Newtonian physics because it does not recognise the two types of energy, but calls them one and that can be done because they are independent, but physically, a shimmer should be used so as to not lose information. This sentence proves that Newtonian physics can/is losing information and scattering enigmas! A proper basis to physics eliminates enigmas and as an indication of the value of the orthogonality of energy/organization, a simple explanation of thinking is that the brain burns energy and that change of energy necessarily creates the ability to think [organization]. What could be simpler! Survival of the fittest has ensured that we utilize that thinking effectively. We all know that our thinking improves when we eat sugar, and when we are low on blood-sugar, we can’t think well. So, consider these quotations.

It can be seen that the following quotation from Wikipedia expresses the standard question about three things, firstly, the mind-body problem, secondly, people know that the brain produces the mind and thirdly, what animals possess a mind. ‘One open question regarding the nature of the mind is the mind–body problem, which investigates the relation of the mind to the physical brain and nervous system. Pre-scientific viewpoints included dualism and idealism, which considered the mind somehow non-physical. Modern views center around physicalism and functionalism, which hold that the mind is roughly identical with the brain or reducible to physical phenomena such as neuronal activity. Another question concerns which types of beings are capable of having minds. For example, whether mind is exclusive to humans, possessed also by some or all animals, by all living things, whether it is a strictly definable characteristic at all, or whether mind can also be a property of some types of man-made machines.’ (Wikipedia, Mind)

Clearly, we can answer these commonly asked questions because the Mind and body are related as orthogonals and, according to Newtonian physics, we appreciate the large consumption of energy in the brain, but fail to associate the orthogonal organization, which is the purpose/result of the Mind. For clarity, there must be organization to balance the energy consumed in the brain because orthogonality requires two parts, and the mind has used a ‘trick’ to survive [chicken and egg problem]. Again, it is easy to see that the function of orthogonality is always there and that the organization and energy are linked [(1+(-1))=0] and so, the Mind is always there and functions at the energy/organization level in the animal. In other words, there is no cut-in point and every bit of Mind helps survival, so, the question is answered.

This assumption that organization can be generated by the consumption of energy is a big ‘ask’, so, I will give an example that shows that the evolution of a mind on a small planet in the universe is trivial when compared to the same process that is in constant use across the universe. Magnetism is an enigma that we have used to build a civilization upon to make electric motors etc. and yet we have little idea of what it is, or its use in the universe. Indeed, Maxwell’s equations only describe its local effects and not ‘what it is’, nor ‘why it is?’. However, as parasites, we have taken it over for our own use.

From chapter 94, ‘measurement and choice are basic to the physics of the universe as well as to Life and as an example, magnetism is appropriate [being part of quantum gravity] to be considered to be the agent of measurement and choice and for that reason is mentioned here, but I will have to postulate the following definition that will not be derived for another half a dozen chapters. Magnetism is the organizational energy created orthogonally with the energy change necessitated by two charged particles moving in two different frames of reference, also, magnetism is the ‘speedometer’ that allows logic to regulate the speed of light and prevent frames of reference exceeding that speed.’ (chapter 99)

‘This shows firstly, what magnetism is [organization], secondly, how it is generated [relativistically] and thirdly, that that generation provides a measurement [speedometer] of the relativity between two frames of reference and this measurement can be used [physical logical choice] to change the dimensions to avert a singularity [exceeding the speed of light] possibility. Fourthly, I have always wondered how the universe kept track of the speed of every [charged] particle at every instant and, this, together with the instantaneous accounting of a probability space seems to provide the answer. Fifthly, the mechanism of the change in the dimensions is logically simple in that it is simpler to change all of the dimensions than to select one [energy is the fifth dimension]. Sixthly, the value of the change is the Lorentz transformation and changing the energy changes the length, time and mass and that creates the enigma of relativity. Seventhly, these strange effects occur because we are forced [lack of choice] to use a probability space as a lens.’

This shows that (relative) speed changes in charged particles, I believe, produce energy changes with magnetism as the organization associated with the change in energy of the charged particles, bearing in mind that that includes every charged particle in the universe in the calculation to gain a certain solution. This quantum gravity solution is a hyperbolically decreasing interaction universe-wide with distance and, I believe is part of the shimmy interaction. A similar process of generating organization in the mind out of a consumption/change of energy in the brain produces the necessary purpose/result of acting out future possible scenarios through organization involving the predator/prey selection of the best/fittest.

This begs the question of ‘consumption/change of energy’ in the face of the traditional view that ‘energy cannot be created nor destroyed’, Total energy is conserved [zero], but energy in both forms is continually being created [together] to allow expansion of the universe [dark energy]. Expansion of the universe is a logical requirement for existence [(1+(-1))=0 expanding] and, considering that the universe is a fractal, Euler’s equation has a number of explanations and I believe that being fractal it must show the formation of the universe as well [at a later date]. (chapter 98)

Two areas are missing from traditional physics that must be included, firstly, the four search axioms linking the mind/brain to the physical. ‘The Math Book, p 284) gives the five Peano Axioms as a basis of arithmetic, and certain things appeared to be missing, such as the mind/brain to determine elegance of content, forward planning, the measurement of each numeral (questing) and the relationship between numerals (relevance)’ (chapter 81). These search axioms were derived from our space and dimensions and join the mental organization of Life with the physical surroundings in an orthogonality that must be part of any ‘new’ (complete) discipline.

Secondly, from chapter 93, ‘logic evolves as we use orthogonality to view the null space as/through a fractal/probability space’ and logic is the organizational physics that is the orthogonal companion that complements Newtonian physics in the top-down/bottom-up sense. Thus, we must use organizational physics to provide a reliable ‘everyday’ logic. At the moment, ‘everyday’ logic has no base and yet it is used to make mental/mind decisions. This is such an important point that I will expand it by saying that, at present, ‘everyday’ logic has no base except from what it gets from physics, but Newtonian physics is only top-down and every concept is (literally) ‘in the air’. Thus, as the functioning of our Mind is based of ‘everyday’ logic, our mind has no base, and our reasoning must be suspect. Organizational physics is thus a ‘new’ logic that is orthogonal to Newtonian physics and ‘fixes’ our thinking and physics to an unchangeable base [dimensions].

I believe that we should consider the mind as organization and the brain as the supplier of energy [first orthogonality] because the brain is reputed to use twenty per cent of the body’s energy. This figure of twenty per cent is often quoted as being a huge power requirement for such a small organ, but considering the brain to be a supplier of energy for the organizational ability of the mind, the largest consumption of energy literally makes the most sense [pun intended]! Also, wherever there is energy, there must be organization to contain it, whether it is a wire or a superconductor and this was shown in chapter 92. Note that from the quotation above, the mind is a function of the neurons, as everybody knows, and that is of course true, but it is the second level orthogonal description, not the first orthogonal of the energy/organization description of the mind, and thus loses the wide-ranging context and harks back to the restrictive Newtonian description.

Similarly, the mathematics of concepts/context, from (a+b)=1 is the basis of the structure and functioning of the Mind [traditional mathematics is a special case] and is obviously based on the dimensions of the physical world. However, Life is a parasite that has evolved and in particular has taken advantage of the mathematical/physical space of the universe to evolve a place and this is clarified by the following quotation from chapter 86.

‘The Math Book, (by Clifford A. Pickover, p 284) gives the five Peano Axioms as a basis of arithmetic, and certain things appeared to be missing, such as the mind/brain to determine elegance of content, forward planning (dimension 7), the measurement of each numeral (questing) and the relationship between numerals (relevance)’.

Further, ‘If we unfold (a+b)=1 in a probability space, as above, including Life, we get:
concept/forward-planning/quest/relevance/beauty/context.

If we unfold (a+b)=1 in a probability space, as above, excluding Life, we get:
measurement/quest/relevance/entanglement.

Notice that forward-planning is a dimension specific to Life and necessary for the predator/prey basis of iteration and the four axioms are immediately obvious in the above.’ This is the basis of General Mathematics or the ‘new’ mathematics that it is an orthogonality of the mathematics of concept/context from the physical world with the top-down concepts and context of the parasitic Life. Given the versatility of the human mind, the axioms are indicating the processes involved in thinking, but there are still problems, and one is ‘choice’, as above, that is lacking in Newtonian physics.

Firstly, how can I explain the ‘richness’ of thought that we are capable of thinking? This ‘richness’ is both the concepts and the context, and an example is music with the multitude of notes [concept] and the relation of each note to every other note in the symphony [context] etc. Why are traditional mathematics and Newtonian physics content to use a restricted view? The easiest way to explain is to consider the probability space (a+b)=1, for measurement/observer and note that in a measuring space there is the physical relationship (a+b)=1 and the orthogonal organizational relationship (a and b)=1, but a and b are general and our Mind/brain has substituted concept/context for measurement/entanglement. We can do this because there do not appear to be limits on a and b [free will] and if we can think of a new relationship, given these constraints, that relationship is available to us. For example, consider computer/processing, telephone/communication, camera/pictures, car/travel and so on.

For completeness, as an after-word, from chapter 107, “One of the main reasons why music is so potent in religion is that it has mysterious powers to express and engender emotions’ (The World’s Religions, second edition, Ninian Smart, p 14) These ‘“mysterious powers”’ are, I believe, the energy/organization of the creation equation that occurs each time that music is played. That is, that the organization inherent in the music produces energy/emotion when it is played, and this is similar to the effect that the Golden triangle has in appreciating/measuring its mathematical organization.” Notice that the consumption of energy in the brain produces organization [thought] and when organization [music] is measured [played], it produces energy [emotion], and that these form a corollary.

This means that, for any orthogonality that we choose to consider, there are concepts and context that we can hold in our Mind/brain because that holding constitutes a measurement/entanglement of a concept/context and we can make a decision and record that decision. That is the process of deduction, research and learning that has expanded the working of our mind/brain into the abstract. In other words, the wonder of creative abstract thinking rests on decision/choice/orthogonality and the recording of the decision in the brain. Further, our Mind/brain that uses the ‘plane’ between the orthogonals is fractal 2, compared with the fractal 1.5 of the orthogonals and fractal 1 for traditional mathematics [as an illustration] and Newtonian physics that are ‘logical’ extensions of one fact to another. This shows how stunting the present mathematics and physics is to our thinking, and as an example, of traditional mathematics distancing itself from computer science, where computer science is a move into/towards the mathematics of concept/context [iteration/infinite series for pi, i, e etc.].

So, our Mind/brain is organizationally built on decision/choice/orthogonality in its functioning as well as physically on the base of the mathematics of concept/context by storing similar concepts in different parts of the cortex, such as sight recordings in the visual area. The cortex is, effectively, a large recording medium where different areas are allocated on use and they become the concept to the entire brain’s context because the recording changes [plasticity] with use. The cortex is a computer’s memory, compared to the hardwired components of the brain, and appears in the higher organisms starting with fish. It is particularly interesting why the brain evolved two hemispheres (chapter 12) and how they are joining.

The above is effectively the software behind the functioning of the Mind and, whilst the electronic computer and the mind/brain have the same use, as a concept and context, they are based on completely different principles of traditional mathematics versus concept/context. It is interesting that the computer has evolved from a calculator, spread-sheet, organizer to operating driver-less cars and trucks and one must ask the question ‘when is it a person?’? Thus, the electronic computer is another example of a new use of a and b that the organization of Life discovered through evolution and answers the question above, that ‘is a machine capable of thought?’, and it is apparent that Life is fundamentally different to a machine because the mind/brain of Life is plastic, but this aspect of updating and ‘blurring’ memories could be added to a machine without difficulty and one then has to ask why we are different to any other machine? Clearly we are not different if the scope/view is adjusted, but, the mind/brain evolved to compare and look for changes in the inputs over time and the action potentials [in the nerves] can be easily ‘hived’ off for comparison to alert us to changes around us.

A machine has a designer and a purpose, whereas we evolved and have to find our own purpose, firstly, as a symbiont to protect our base/planet and secondly, ‘the sky is the limit’ because a and b are unspecified. However, we have made a mess in trying to devise our own organization, but now we have the means to ‘do it properly’ by managing through the mathematics of concept/context. The concept of orthogonality is trivial, and is nothing more that two opposites [with entanglement], but it is also extremely powerful because a and b are undefined in the fifth dimension (a+b)=1 and thirdly, allow us to move into a higher fractal dimension in a number of directions. The physical is measurement/entanglement, Life uses concept/context, we use phone/communication, computer/entanglement for the electronic and mind/brain computers, technology/environment-control and the understanding of this paper that is top-down/bottom-up-orthogonality/communication. Technology/control, where the control/context is lacking, as it is at present, has led to our placing our existence in jeopardy through global warming etc.

As a specific example of measurement/entanglement, ‘most scientists no longer feel that specific mirror neurons exist; instead, there is a brainwide mirroring system whose tasks are shared by a number of regions and pathways.’ (Four Ways to Click, Amy Banks, Leigh Ann Hirschman, p 5) ‘Although many in the scientific community have expressed excitement about the discovery of mirror neurons, there are scientists who have expressed doubts about both the existence and role of mirror neurons in humans. According to scientists such as Hickok, Pascolo, and Dinstein, it is not clear whether mirror neurons really form a distinct class of cells (as opposed to an occasional phenomenon seen in cells that have other functions), and whether mirror activity is a distinct type of response or simply an artifact of an overall facilitation of the motor system.’ (Wikipedia, Mirror neuron)

At what level is the measurement/entanglement? It is a property of the space and forms the physical link between the person’s brain and what they are measuring and the measurement is in the action potentials that pass to the brain and are recorded in the brain. The energy/organization of the action potentials recording the actions is (presumably) a circulating chain/train creating an associated organization that is able to be read and contribute information and the sampling/hiving-off of action potentials is particularly easy. This appears no different to the purpose of other recording neurons and it seems simpler to not create a special class of neurons [concept], but to consider the organization [context] of neurons. It is interesting that, just as the speed of light is relatively slow and that fact enables the universe time to form and create/evolve us, the slow speed of the action potentials is a means of allowing the action potentials to be held as a short-term ‘random memory’ in some form of ‘circular path of neurons’ that must be logically present in the brain because it can take years for a memory to be implanted in the cortex (chapters 7 to 11).

‘This conduction and transmission of action potentials is the only functional activity of our neurons. Their collective circuitry forms the fastest communication system within the body. Impulses ripple across their surfaces at an average of two hundred and fifty miles an hour, a speed which makes their transverses of the body very nearly instantaneous.’ (Job’s Body, Deane Juhan, p 155) The relativity of speed appears to be used to advantage within our universe and the mechanics/hardware of the brain is becoming apparent because a ‘circular path of neurons’ is not unlike a ‘do loop’ in Fortran.

Further, the neurons are organizational links that play a part organizationally and if one is to interpret something that they have seen, the best way is to use the existing machine/brain/mind in its entirety. In other words, a child sits, turns an imaginary steering wheel and says broom-broom to experience driving a car, whereas a better method is to sit in a car and practice gear changes etc. without starting the car [as happens in dreams]. There is no need to postulate mirror neurons if organization is recognized.

Conclusion: to consolidate the above, the Mind/brain showcases the need for the adoption of the ‘new’ disciplines because firstly, they are orthogonally ‘tacked-on’ and do not disrupt, only expand our knowledge. Secondly, ‘everyday’ logic, which is part of our everyday thinking processes has been put on a solid, correct foundation as organizational physics. Thirdly, mathematical physics is basic to the social sciences and currently they are being denied the contextual organization of the ‘new’ disciplines and as a result, I believe, civilization has problems.

There are a lot of concepts and context in the forgoing and I have to ask myself ‘are they all necessary?’ and they are necessary because the universe is a simple place but a fractal expansion can make it complicated, and an example is the Mandlebrot sequence from a simple formula. The creation of the universe has the same form as has everything in the universe because the creation defined the dimensions and the first orthogonality produces energy and organization and that is the universe and the mind/brain. Change/burn energy and the associated organization changes [magnetism, quantum gravity] and we see new organization as occurs in the search for subatomic particles where higher energies produce new particles.

Then we have to look at the measuring space that can be used to view our universe and that appears to be an orthogonality of a probability space and a fractal space and that introduces the idea of measuring completeness, such as Feynman’s history and the mathematics of concept/context where certainty only comes with completeness of measuring every point/path. Also, the intelligence/organization of the mind as a measuring space is related to the brain’s energy consumption and a measurement of the brain’s energy consumption should give a good measure of a person’s intelligence in a way that can be easily and cheaply measured.

Lack of adequate organization is literally jeopardizing our existence as we use technology without the constraints demanded by an adequate use of context/control. It is up to us to circumvent a ‘hard-landing’ because it will not fix itself and survival of the fittest is the natural option if the planet is spared.

References: all quotations are fully referenced in the body and earlier chapters can be found on darrylpenney.com if required.

Chapter 92: The ‘New Physics’: the Orthogonality of Organizational and Newtonian Physics, Quantum Gravity, the Covalent Chemical Bond, the Enigmatic Pauli Exclusion Principle, Superconductivity, Logic Defined and the Mathematics of Concept/context

Chapter 93: ‘Searching for the Best’ – Re-establishing Evolution Using the ‘New’ Physics and the ‘New’ Mathematics

Chapter 94: Defining Choice Within a ‘New’ Philosophy, the Mind is the Organizational Orthogonality of the Brain’s Energy, How the Voting System Effects Housing Affordability and How to Fix It

Chapter 81: Parasites in Probability Space, General Mathematics, Logic, Measurement, Organization, the Four Axioms of Measurement that Link the Mind/brain to Mathematics and the Dimensions of a Probability Space, Life as a Possible Sixth Dimension, the Why of Godel’s Incompleteness Theorems and the Goal of Explaining Everything by a Single, Elegant, Unified Equation is Attained.

Chapter 86: How the Mind Works, Evolution in Mind-space, the Placebo/nocebo Effect Has Two Parts, Combating Chronic Pain, Why Eastern and Western Medicine are Similar, Unfolding Mind-space from the Fifth Dimension and the Law of Conservation of Minimum Energy

Chapter 7: A Mathematics of the Mind

Chapter 8: The Brain

Chapter 9: The Brain and Mind

Chapter 10: Creative Thinking – the Ninth Sense

Chapter 11: Changing your Mind – the Seventh Sense

Chapter 12 Why the Brain has Two Hemispheres

Chapter 107: Filosofy Rewrites Philosophy to be Able to Explain Beauty, Music, the Golden Triangle, Emotion etc. and How to Approach the Gun Question

Chapter 99: The Principle of Relativity, the Role and Importance of Magnetism, the Amplitude of Electromagnetic Waves and Unfolding the Photon

Chapter 98: The Principle of Relativity, the Creation and Euler’s Equation Explained