Chapter 93: ‘Searching for the Best’ – Re-establishing Evolution Using the ‘New’ Physics and ‘New’ Mathematics

by Darryl Penney
Abstract: the important tools of the ‘new’ physics, the ‘new’ mathematics and the ‘new’ logic are used in the ‘search for the best’ people to re-establish the evolution that our top-down ad hoc organizations have thwarted. These tools will be used to show how top-down and bottom-up must align for both the parasite of Life and the creation of our universe to enable us to repair the organizational and evolutionary problems that we have created by using top-down organizational guesses/decisions and so create a unique decision-making ‘search for the best’ to re-invigorate and re-track our evolution. Examples are given of the universality of the method and how it defines the uniqueness of the democracy of the ancient Greeks and shows how Plato’s ideas of government are relevant today. The determination and death orgenes (organizational genes) of Life allow participation in restarting evolution on a personal level through knowledge of anti-aging and modern technology, or, using the fractal nature of the universe, on a world-wide basis to establish ‘searching for the best’ via country or world government.
Our planet suffers from social and physical problems that we have caused that could drastically change our lifestyle (and even our existence) for the worse because it is apparent that our social organizations are not working satisfactorily. So, how can the ‘new physics’ and ‘new mathematics’ help us plan a logical workable system that can replace the present, obviously unworkable system? We have used a poorly designed organizational system to replace the ‘survival of the fittest’, in which we evolved, and we need to plan a ‘search for the best’ to enable us to change ourselves organizationally to become symbiotic with our environment. I believe that using these two tools is the only way to ‘marry’ our future as a symbiont with the wellbeing of our environment, as shown by parasites in nature, and form a guide to determine the necessary organization, because these two disciplines link our mind/brain with the creative processes of the universe.
I would like to ‘set the stage’ with the following quotations, from chapter 92, ‘Einstein postulated the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment in the Special Theory of Relativity that every measurer/observer sees the speed of light as a constant and I do not blame him (postulating) because it is (at first sight) enigmatic, but, using a probability space, which is a measuring space, explains the enigma in the above. Whilst the universe is obviously fractal, as seen in the stars, galaxies, doublets and triplets of the subatomic particles, combining these two spaces and reducing the orthogonality proves the statement’: that ‘logic evolves as we use orthogonality to view the null space as/through a fractal/probability space.’ ‘This result is astounding, that everything in the universe is a decision/orthogonality!’
”The ‘new physics’ is based on orthogonality, not energy, and that is a much more fundamental concept. Likewise, the mathematics of concept/context where each of concept and context is independent and equally important (with a name change to reflect this) must become the ‘new mathematics’.” Note that there is one orthogonality, but many types of energy.
“Considering that neither Newtonian physics nor traditional mathematics is solidly based on the dimensions, the possibility exists to revamp our social organizations so that they work better for us by using the mathematics of concept/context to improve the ‘survival of the best’”

The above quotations have been chosen from chapter 92 to highlight the important tools that were derived in that chapter and to establish the context that the ‘new physics’, the ‘new mathematics’, the ‘new’ logic and ‘search for the best’ will make to a new paradigm that we desperately need. Traditional mathematics is a special case of the mathematics of concept/context, and adding the search axioms this becomes general mathematics or, the ‘new’ mathematics. Traditional ‘everyday logic’ that has been ignored by everyone, presumably because it had no solid basis, has found a home as organizational physics that is orthogonal to Newtonian physics and together, they become the ‘new physics’. ‘Search for the best’ is the ultimate aim for our species that, I believe, the two tools of the ‘new’ physics and the ‘new’ mathematics will help us attain.

Reaffirming from above, ‘everything in the universe is a decision/orthogonality’ and in particular, the most important decision that we have to make is how to manage our planet, its animals and us for the long-term and now, at last, we have the tools to understand and manage these decisions. The tools are the ‘new mathematics’ and ‘new physics’ and they are solidly and uniquely based on the dimensions and so, they can describe and derive any and all of the organizations of our society and, in particular, through their use can contribute to the ‘search for the best’.

As a digression, from the abstract of chapter 92 “organizational physics and Newtonian physics are strange ‘bed-fellows’, but creating an orthogonality of the two parts is a relatively painless means of modernizing Newtonian physics by creating a ‘new’ physics. This bottom-up and top-down approach creates a workable combination of traditional and organizational physics, and it is still an orthogonality because (literally) everything is an orthogonality.” This gives the impression that organizational physics and Newtonian physics have been ‘cobbled together’ in expediency, but, being based on the dimensions, there can be no question that the ‘new physics’ is not adequate or ‘up to the job.” In other words, Newtonian physics is looking top-down from our point of view, whereas organizational physics is bottom-up based on the dimensions, and being parasites in a physical world, we must consider both views and further, below, more orthogonalities will come into being [fractalization].

‘Survival of the fittest’ is a workable system that has worked for 3,000 million years and, within which, we evolved, and it is still widespread and working, effectively, in humans, as genocide, ethnic cleansing, the food chain etc., as well as in the rest of the undisturbed (by us) world. Thus, ‘survival of the fittest’ has an organizational base that works and it is no surprise that that base is decision/orthogonality. This is shown by asking the questions: ‘shall I attack/eat that potential food?’, ‘can I get away from that attacker?’, ‘will I move to fresh pasture?’ etc. This simplification is at the heart of ‘survival of the fittest’ and is based on decision/orthogonality.

Decision/orthogonality is universal because it was derived bottom-up and must form the basis of any new system of ‘search for the best’ if our species is to succeed and, as we have evolved within this universe, we are parasites and must, to be considered successful, become symbiotic with our environment. This is the view from bottom-up [organizational physics] and we need the view top-down [Newtonian physics] to amalgamate the two. Notice that the universe has enabled Life to exist through evolving an organization and we have/are attempting to replace that organization with our social organization without incorporating the bottom-up organization of the universe and we wonder why it is not working.

Everyday logic has traditionally had no unique base, and yet has been used because it is so necessary to everyday life. Clearly, its rightful place is in organizational physics, but is only useful/unique and able to be used with confidence when it can be seen to have a rightful place and be derived from the spaces and the dimensions. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to use the correct logic in the top-down social organizations that we need to use, and that can be done by creating an orthogonality of the proposed social organization (top-down) and the logic of the organizational physics (bottom-up). We have tried designing our own systems and organizations without a solid base and we have brought about the possibility of a climatic catastrophe, not to mention an extinction event.

Mathematics has been called the ‘handmaiden of the sciences’ and we could consider the ‘new’ mathematics to be the context of the conceptual ‘new’ physics and consider the two as an orthogonality. The ‘new’ physics also orthogonates biology and thus the ‘new’ physics forms a base of biology and allows me to apply organizational principles that were derived in physics, to biology. This would be expected as a fractal contains reoccurring elements, so, this is my licence to apply organization and logic to biology (and everything else) and know that it is appropriate and further, it is my licence to say that there can be no enigmas. This last statement might need expansion because it is used in the sense that enigmas appear in traditional physics because traditional physics is incomplete, whereas any enigmas that appear in the ‘new physics’ must be due to our misunderstanding (and its legitimacy is this point).

I think that everyone would agree that our ancestors evolved a bigger and more complex mind/brain, over time, and along the way we developed stone axes, simple farming, agriculture and technology and in the process developed organizations, new foods and bred without control so as to endanger our host/planet. We are parasites in the true sense of the word, but also, we remain parasites because we are a drag on the environment, causing global warming and we have to change to reach symbiosis. A permanent solution/change that allows us to coexist with our host requires an organizational solution and one possible solution that I believe is feasible is based on Plato’s ideas and is given in chapter 67.

Plato’s ideas are based on a democracy that was enforced by lack of technology, by firstly, the voter had to physically be at the discussion to vote, and was also secondly, voting was restricted to the warrior/fighting/noble/educated class. This created a true democracy that we do not have today because our ‘democracy’ is based on firstly, any adult person’s vote, secondly, whether of not they know anything about the discussion, thirdly, that the vote is hidden behind a veil of secrecy that obscures the motives of the voter and fourthly, whether they can be bothered voting. It is apparent that the democracy of the Ancient Greeks aligned with the fundamental decision/orthogonality that is lacking in the modern, so called ‘democracy’. This is a crucial point that the ‘democracy’ that we use fails the decision/orthogonality test!

To repeat, the top-down approach is distorting unless the orthogonal, bottom-up, is considered. From chapter 91, ‘so, I can view a null space, where each particle contains equal energy and organization, through a probability/fractal space and this concept presents the context of virtual/orthogonal choices/particles that are (literally) everywhere, even inside and part of elementary particles because, I believe they are the manifestation of choice. Consider, from chapter 90, ‘“a Herculean effort … to try to calculate the fundamental properties of protons and neutrons …. Three quarks contained therein, but there is also a lot of other stuff. In particular, virtual particles reflecting the particles and fields that convey the strong force between quarks are popping in and out of existence all the time…. when we try to estimate how much they might contribute to the mass of the proton, we find that the quarks themselves provide very little of the total mass and that the fields created by these particles contribute most of the energy that goes into the proton’s rest energy and hence, its rest mass.” (A Universe from Nothing, Lawrence M. Krauss, p 69)’

Notice that one of the important points that was made using this quotation originally was that these virtual particles are orthogonal particles that have zero energy, whereas ordinary particles, virtual or not, traditionally contain energy and this point has caused problems in Newtonian physics [no orthogonal particles]. My interpretation of creation is the Big Whoosh that is (somewhat) similar to the Big Bang after 10 to the –32 seconds, but in time becomes a steady state. The multitude of orthogonal particles, that are necessarily everywhere serve as ‘choices’ and each orthogonality is initially (effectively) similar to the Big Whoosh that recombine to zero/nothing if not used.

The above paragraph is the bottom-up explanation of choice and this must ‘continue’ throughout the universe because our space is fractal and contains recurring derivations of the dimensions. This, I believe shows that the democracy of the ancient Greeks contains the orthogonality that the voter was informed and present/allowed-to-vote at the vote because the orthogonal particles orthogonate into existence (at the lowest energy, zero, and orthogonate to higher energies progressively, still zero in sum, to present all possibilities of choice). In other words, all possibility/choices should passthrough the mind of the voter and the more trained/knowledgeable the mind, the better the choice and the vote.

This is the reason that universities must be involved in the voting system [repository of all knowledge]. This statement is crucial to understanding the organizational statement in the previous paragraph that orthogonality is the basis of our universe and requires ALL choices be presented to the discussion, which is the mathematics of concept/context and the universities (usually) contain the best information. I have to say that universities and journals presently fail to see the value of specialist/generalist orthogonality, though IOP is currently redressing/addressing that situation. How can the average person/voter make a choice without a balanced critique from the universities?

Thus, I believe that the ancient Greeks used a true democracy compared to our watered-down placatory system and that I have reconciled top-down and bottom-up for the ancient Greek’s system, but not for us, nor can it ever be justified logically. I can now say that our system is not logical without fear of argument because logic has been anchored in the dimensions through the organizational physics, and further, this inability to argue and ‘muddy’ discussion is augmented by the transparency afforded by the mathematics of concept/context because context is afforded its rightful prominence. Context brings arrangements, interests, collaborations etc. of the various parties into the discussion and decreases ‘wriggle-room’. An example of this is food industry power versus the China Study, below.

We derived decision/orthogonality as the basis of everything (1+(-1))=0 derived from the dimensions, especially the fifth dimension (a+b)=1 and used it in physics, biology and politics to illustrate that it is applicable everywhere (concept) and also, that a fractal repeatability (context) occurs within and across each discipline. I have mentioned generalists and specialists in fields of academic endeavour and, I believe that this derivation finally proves, beyond doubt, that there is a place for a specialist and generalist together [an orthogonality], whether as a formal team or individuals. This statement brings into question the peer review of scientific papers and I suggest that the reviewer be the vice-chancellor of a university that can allocate a paper to be reviewed between a number/range of faculties.

Given that the most important quest, I believe, is to make ourselves symbionts with our world and that we now have the tools in the ‘new mathematics’ and the ‘new physics’ to do it, how can we do it? Clearly, we can build organizations in our mind/brains, but they only align with the reality of the universe if they are based on the ‘new’ mathematics, the ‘new’ physics and decision/orthogonality. Our ability to create organizations, dreams, plans etc. come from a sixth dimension that Life evolved that is forward planning that is a necessary consequence of survival of the fittest and allows our mind/brain to use the plane between the orthogonalities. Further, given the fractal nature of the universe, anything that is derived here on an organizational level will be applicable on a personal level, and that will be shown below [an example is the Christian Church arising from ‘grass-roots’].

Thus, it would pay us to use a system that works successfully in nature and has done so for millions of years [as a workable example of the mathematics of concept/context] and we find an orthogonality of those that scatter their sex cells to the wind and water, such as corals, fish, pine trees and other windblown pollinators and the independent method used by those plants and animals with an additional selection. This wind/water dispersal procedure is successful because survival of the fittest applies later, but a more targeted approach is the herd system where a number of females mate with a local best/strongest male.

Now, I am content to put forward a practical means of a ‘selection of the best’ to show a basis built on orthogonality, but many variations are possible and will, hopefully be discussed as a truly informed democracy, as above. Humans have a hybrid system of a single mate, presumably because of the length of nurture, protection and learning required by children. However the large families of the past are no longer necessary with modern medicine, as well as the progress that has been made in the reduction of violence, the advent of social security and government payments and redistribution and this ‘constancy’ allows better control of the population through the social technology that we are formulating here.

Improvements, changes, mongering of various types have been applied to distort the political system, and worst of all, the major political parties openly champion the rich or the poor and formulate possible policies to help their own supporters in exchange for their own benefits. The orthogonality of the mathematics of concept/context shows that for every concept, put forward by a political party, there are contexts that affect every other concept of people, groups, foods, food producers, incomes etc. The opposition political parties show/are an attempt at orthogonality and show that it is necessary, but it is limited as it stands. Remember that the mathematics of concept/context is based on the dimensions and can be relied upon to provide a solution, but entrenched industry groups, especially dairy, meat and sugar are a danger through lobbying governments, as they were set up to do. Notice again, the example of food industry groups versus the China Study, T. Colin Campbell and Thomas M. Campbell II, in nutrition leading to longer/healthier lifetimes.

Technology is one of our greatest achievements, but the lack of context/control has endangered Life, but, I believe that the solution is at hand, but, who will administer a solution? This is an extremely important question that is answered below as this organization solution is fractal (of course) and can be implemented as a combined effort, as a group effort, or individually. It will be shown that determination and death are organizational genes [orgene] that are basic to Life and this impetus allows me to offer these choices and to ‘back-off’ and watch the results. In other words, Life has a necessary built-in organization [orgenes] that creates growth and mirrors [fractalization] the growth/expansion of the universe that powers everything.

Philosophy was the first (recognised) discipline and it hived off the various specialities until today it has the reputation of not having any questions to which there are answers. For example, consider formal logic, whereas the (unsupported) everyday logic has been utilized widely although no one knows what everyday logic is. Now that everyday logic has been given a solid base as organizational physics and the major (conceptual) tools are part of mathematics and physics, what becomes of the contextual tools. A generalist discipline such as philosophy is ideal to link/relate every social discipline from biology to politics to sociology and become the champion of context and help solve the world’s organizational/social problems.

I have mentioned the herd as a proven organizational solution arising out of the iteration of the evolution of Life and that forms a solid base, but considering the importance of technology, any solution to the world’s problems must be largely technological as well as organizational. In the orthogonal sense, each is an independent concept but relies heavily on each other contextually and I will apply them to the herd concept. An example of the type of interaction envisaged in a top-down mode can be found in chapter 54 that takes one aspect to completion unlike my aim at the moment, which is to legitimise the tools for a full-frontal attack.

I will quote the abstract and first paragraph from chapter 54, ‘“determination” is an organisational necessity for there to be life, and is the driving force behind evolution and is the key requirement for business and life success and thus to limit population and improve quality of life for children. Social security and/or tax benefits should be paid to people without children, and this reversal of the current practice is a general solution to promote the “Best” and reduce poverty by negative feedback.’

‘I have said previously that “we evolved a reality out of the possibility of existence”, but “we” is a little imprecise, and it occurred to me that as the “death gene” was an organizational “something”, we might be able to clarify the “we” as an organizational “something” as well. The first step might be to replace the word ‘gene’ with something that is more apt and perhaps “orgene” suggests organization and genetics, which is in line with what I am seeking.’

Firstly, I should have postulated ‘everyday logic’ because, at that time, I had little knowledge of what logic was or where it came from. Secondly, I did not realize at the time that the concept of a gene (physical) required an orthogonal ‘orgene’ (organization), thirdly, that an orgene is a non-logical action on the individual’s part that is necessary for the good of the species and fourthly, the ‘death orgene’ is, I believe, an organizational gene that allows the young breeders to live at the expense of the older, more experienced females of the herd to reduce birth defects, renew/revitalize the herd etc.

Fifthly, from chapter 54, ‘determination is an organisational necessity for there to be life’, and I can say that because we are here and we are only here because we were determined to live and procreate, so perhaps we should say that ‘determination evolved a reality out of the possibility of existence’. As determination is organisational as well as genetically based, then determination must be an orgene and it is a fact that everyone alive today has an unbroken continuous line of ancestors, each of which had at least one offspring that successfully bred over 3,000 million years.’

The substance of chapter 54 was that if you have a number of children, they should support you in old age, whereas, people with no children (or few children) should receive a pension and this would act to limit large families. Large families are probably against the developed nation’s best interests because of the decreased possibilities for non-best children through lack of opportunities for education, funding, nutrition etc. The developing world’s idea of large families to support you in old age does not seem appropriate in a developed world having social security. ‘It was also previously pointed out that those receiving pensions should lose a proportion of their vote, simply because every one will agree that you shouldn’t be allowed to vote for your own benefit’ (chapter 22)

In a ‘developed’ country, there is a ‘baby bonus’ of several thousand dollars for a woman having a child and a ‘single mother’s pension’ for a single woman with a child. It could be considered that the child might be disadvantaged, especially if the mother is young, poorly educated and/or a bit of a misfit by being overweight etc. This is similar to the herd situation that could be improved if the dominant male was the sire and improved even more if there was selection of the mothers.

It seems necessary to include technology in any supposition and the most relevant to selection would be the internet dating sites to bring people together, IVF for fertilization and the government for funding those women participating. This closely matches the herd situation where all women (that choose to) could use a superior male to have children via IVF and financial support. At present, a single mother loses her support on becoming married or de facto, and it is sensible that the mother continue to receive the payment (or a significant part) for life as a dowry to attract a husband and further, the husband in the case of (selected) children that were not his, receives an aged pension whereas, if the children are his, he receives a reduced amount.

The example of the single mother, and the Churches’ message of compassion are nice thoughts, but our ultimate aim is to improve our relationship with the environment otherwise it will eventually come tumbling down into anarchy. Politicians are ‘showmen’ and good at ‘glad-handing’ and kissing babies and they have an important place in doing this, but that place is not making policy. The universities have not come forward, possibly because they are immersed in specific disciplines, but, now that the tools are available and the proof, above, that generalists are (equally) necessary, the stage is set to get behind Plato’s (modernized) ideas (chapter 67).

This simple example/paper is a step towards ‘selection of the best’, and notice that it does not inconvenience nor harm anybody and it is not ‘survival of the best’ with a price to pay. It will take time, planning and redirecting money/taxes, but it starts the process of improving the species and it can be done transparently through the mathematics of concept/context. It may take generations to accomplish, but possibly not, because there is negative feedback in the best people wanting the best life for themselves and their children and they can attain success/satisfaction quickly.

For example, the Philippines, is composed of 7,000 islands near the Tropics, suffers from over-population [over 100 million people] and shortness of statue [perhaps due to the island effect)] and a friend named Donna says that she would like to be taller and whiter and I pointed out that that was a bit difficult, but she could ensure that her children were taller and whiter by marrying a European that she might be able to find on an internet dating site. The average lifetime in Australia is 12 years longer than the Philippines and with the application of anti-aging [nutrition, exercise and state of mind] she could expect another 23 years giving an extra 35 years of healthy life at the peak of her intellect and assets. To paraphrase Crocodile Dundee -‘Now that’s a Life!’

Decision/orthogonality is fundamental to the universe (physically) and to ourselves (as parasites) and any set of proposals as above, require a decision, even if it is to ignore it, but the contexts remain and there are many to be examined. A number of the early chapters are relevant that were written on specific subjects before I found the ‘heavy hitting/lifting’ tools of ‘the “new” physics, the “new” mathematics, the “new” logic and “search for the best”’, but, the basic premise is that organizational technology will make a specific technology, like genetics, unnecessary.

I am not saying that genetics is unimportant, I am saying that it will become unnecessary, except for medical reasons, because the ‘best people’ will change themselves organizationally by selection and knowledge of proper nutrition etc. An example is the China Study that compares a high vegetable diet in China to a high meat diet in the Western world and the alleged manipulation of consumers by the food industry. The answers are now available to the (best) enquiring minds as top-down because the bottom-up tools provide the base and the ‘best’ will have the determination orgene to start the process to reach the final and ultimate flowering of the species in a personal as well as a species sense.

I hasten to add that there is no test to determine whether you qualify as one of the best, it is the determination orgene that will make you the best and answers can be found in earlier chapters or on my website.

A final word, that the above is not all that different to what has gone/been-done before, but now it rests unassailably on an unshakable bedrock and this gives it a legitimacy that cannot be questioned, but of course, the contexts are always open to discussion.

References: all quotations are fully referenced in the body and earlier chapters can be found on darrylpenney.com if required.

Chapter 91: Organizational Physics: ‘Why Things Happen?’, Quantum Gravity, ‘Everyday’ Logic and the Theory of Everything (1+(-1))=0 Derived from Nothing

Chapter 90: Organizational Physics Replaces Mathematical Physics with Fundamental Extensions in Mathematics and Physics.

Chapter 92: The Covalent Chemical Bond, the Enigmatic Pauli Exclusion Principle and Superconductivity Explained

Chapter 67: Unfolding Democracy, the Fifth Dimension and Waking Plato to Save our World

Chapter 54: The Determination Orgene, Selecting the ‘Best’ and a General Solution to ‘Struggle Street’ and the World’s Overpopulation.

Chapter 22: Magic, Proverbs, Politics and the Voting System