by Darryl Penney

 

Abstract: the mind uses general mathematics to link the parasite of Life into the physical space of the universe, and further, uses an entanglement between the physical ‘+’ and logical ‘and’, that represents the local and gravity entanglements, to evolve a new ‘mind’ space for the organism that is an organization of cells that are able to produce the mind that allows the organism to compete better. The placebo/nocebo is the outcome of this organization, but a second effect could be called the Mandrake effect after the comic character that allows medicines to function, forms miracle cures and links Eastern and Western medicine into a single entity. Unfolding/questing the fifth dimension is continued using the physical ‘+’ and logical ‘and’, and this new space describes the operation of the mind and requires an additional condition to the law of conservation of (minimum) energy to further align a probability space with our view of the world.

 

Part 1: Defining the Mind

 

I have previously looked at the mind/brain in the context of the mathematics of concepts, but in chapter 85, I defined general mathematics to be ‘the mathematics of concepts and the four axioms of Life that we, as parasites, have built on the measurement/entanglement of our probability universe’ and this addition of the four axioms links the context of the mind/brain into the physical world. These four axioms are important because the evolution of the mind/brain increased the relation/relativity of the organism with the physical world.

 

General mathematics is necessarily simple and is composed of two parts, the mathematics of concepts that presents the concepts and the contexts between them because the fifth dimension says that concept and context are orthogonal/independent and so, both parts must be considered, as in Cartesian coordinates. The four axioms I will now call ‘search axioms’ because there must be forward-planning to initiate the search, questing is (total) searching, relevance is comparing the search elements and elegance is the selection.

 

The elegance of this derivation is obvious in its simplicity, but, I do wish to point out that it took me years to derive the mathematics of concepts, only to find it obvious within the fifth dimension and it took months to derive the four search axioms as part of Life, the space and the fifth dimension, only to find that they are obvious from common sense, when you look bottom up. This, I believe, shows that common sense is derived from the ‘shards’/pieces of the fundamental organization behind the universe as well as the need for a bottom-up approach.

 

There is a point that should be stressed in that the operator (a+b)=1, the fifth dimension, is important/basic and different a and b can be used and this gave the use of the concept/context by Life as a parasite based on the physical measurement/entanglement of the probability space. In the same way, Life uses the search axioms that are parts of Life, space and the fifth dimension as a means of searching/using mental/psychological thoughts in a way that is a higher level than the physical parts on which they are based.

 

The below shows that the structure of the brain is in the form of a mathematics of concepts and the four search axioms show that a sequence exists that a parasite can use to search for food etc., and this can be combined with the change from the basic measurement/entanglement to the concept/context of Life. The final sequence, I believe, that leads to abstract thinking is using the process that the universe uses to expand, and that is the creation of energy. When you think, you create energy because the basic relation between measurement/observer (a, b) requires the use/creation of energy and energy is equivalent to (a+b)=1 because our universe is an energy based probability space.

 

The structure of the mathematics of concepts is (a+b)=1 and (a and b)=1 for concepts and contexts a and b, and shows the physical ‘+’ and the logical ‘and’, and all three spaces have been augmented by Life through competition/environment. Now mathematics dislikes this particular questing (‘+/and’) and physics barely tolerates it, but questing is necessary in a probability space because there must be instantaneous and continual monitoring of the conservation of energy. In practice, there is no energy because nothing (literally) quests to negative gravity energy and positive (everything else) energy. Further, all energy is accountable, and in particular, rewriting the above sentence, the sum of the physical energy and logical energy must be the same, and must be zero because they are ‘mirror’/orthogonal images of each other. The Big Bang is neither accountable nor explicable as is also the enigma of inflation and so, must be counted as cosmology’s greatest/largest error

 

Now from chapter 81, ‘unfold (a+b)=1, where unfolding is following the questing [of quantum mechanics, evolution, business etc.]. The fifth dimension (a+b)=1, in this simple form produces four absolutes/solutions (ignoring, for the moment, the fact that the speed of light is an absolute and must be constant):

(a) measurement/entanglement that are local physical and independent/orthogonal (a+b)=1 [classical local action and reaction of matter that provides expansion of the universe, reflection, diffraction of light and water waves],

(b) measurement/entanglement that are universe-wide logical and independent/orthogonal (a and b)=1 [conservation of (zero) energy across the universe, gravity, creation of space/mass/energy/time through the Lorentz contraction],

(c) measurement/entanglement that are local physical and independent/orthogonal, (a+b) [local/personal appreciation], and

(d) measurement/entanglement that are universe-wide logical and independent/orthogonal (a and b) [universal/reality-wide appreciation]’

 

‘Note that (a) and (b) are the physical structure of the universe [described in many earlier chapters] and (c) and (d) were derived in chapter 78 resulting from the ratio of an interval [Golden ratio] that has been reported to produce a feeling that is used, I believe, by Life to compare contentment/elegance/beauty in both a personal and a reality-wide comparison that is behind the important sexual selection as a major driver in evolution.’

 

‘For completeness, I want to foreshadow another quest that is the “orderliness” of (a+b)=1 that embodies a general mathematic/organization that lies behind logic/mathematics. In a similar way that proverbs are a higher level of thought, everyday logic is, I believe, the reverse, and is our view of, or the mental “breakdown” of organization.’

 

I would like to make two observations, firstly, the operator (a +/and b)=1 allows any a and b, even concepts, and it shows Plato’s problem of no absolutes, and this suggests a continuum and a reality. Secondly, ‘+/and’ monitors a ‘free-flow’ of energy between the physical and the logical/psychological, and thus allows the construction of a new type of space that is a mind-space. This is obvious because we can think an abstract thought (psychological) and remember it (physical).

 

This is so important that I will repeat it, firstly, that even concepts and context (the mathematics of concepts) can be handled mathematically, and secondly, using the same expression, even concepts and context (the mathematics of concepts) can be used in a new space (‘+/and’) that I will call the mind-space. We have complex concepts that are psychologically linked to the physical brain/body and this suggests that if the ‘+/and’ space is created physically, it is created logically, and if it is created logically, it is created physically. This point of difficulty is nicely and simply solved by Life by the creation of energy because logical energy is gravity-like and is negative, whilst physical energy is positive. The creation of a thought creates negative energy equal and opposite to the positive energy that records that thought. This creation of energy in thought/remembering is consistent with the creation of energy in the expansion of the universe in the Big Whoosh.

 

If a thought is both negative energy and a measurement/concept, it must create a positive record in the brain if we are to remember it to work with it. I remember reading that the measuring and recording of a quantum event, even though no mind/brain read the result, at that time, caused the wave function to collapse. This concept of the act of measuring and ‘condensing’ the wave function has been around for a century and now it becomes clear that the act of measurement creates (negative) energy and that must balance the act of recording in (positive) energy. I have always found the idea of collapsing wave functions a little strange and am more comfortable with energy creation, especially as this is the mechanism of the Big Whoosh.

 

I have to confess that I have never understood the problem of Schrodinger’s cat, but it seems to involve measurement/recording and as I believe that there cannot be enigmas using general mathematics, looking at the problem of measuring, this is easily resolved because negative energy is accountable at infinite speed and thus, measuring and recording occur at the same time. Hence, it appears more fundamental to say that the fifth dimension is (a+b)=1 for measurement/record rather than saying measurement/observer.

 

The basis of a probability space is entanglement and there appears to be an entanglement relationship between ‘+’ and ‘and’ that appears to cause a relationship between the logical and the physical. One result of this is that if a belief introduces a false measurement, who is to say that that measurement is false and that belief could/should become physical. This is the stuff of miracles, scientists that publish ‘incorrect’ data and miracle cures.  Science uses peer review to gain a consensus, but what of the discrepancy in Newton’s laws of motion and diffraction that everyone appears to accept? There is another case that I will call the Mandrake effect after the comic book character/magician and it is simply that other concepts/contexts (a, b) may exist that allow us power over the physical/mental world if we can invent/believe them.

 

Whilst there are possibilities in such a fundamental operator, ‘+/and’ is basically simple, but far-reaching because it is the relation that was sought in chapter 84 that negated the Principle of Least Action. ‘The reason that particles, light etc. unfailingly travel in a straight line, given no entanglement, is that, if they did not, they would cause a logical singularity in the conservation of energy equation (a and b)=1 because it would have multiple solutions. In other words, a particle does not travel in a straight line because of momentum, but because momentum/energy is accountable in a measuring space, and it can be restated, again, that travel in a straight line is not only a physical property, but also a logical property, as above. Chapter 75 uses the local entanglement of (a+b)=1 to show simply why diffraction occurs and the form of the resultant wavefront. Huygens describes the effect, but the underlying principle has evaded researchers because the answer is (local) logical/entanglement.’

 

‘Entrainment was discovered in 1665 by the Dutch physicist Christiaan Huygens, who was also the first scientist to propose that light was made of waves. He observed that two swinging pendulums mounted together – out of sync – will over time begin a synchronized swing, in what he called an “odd sympathy”. (The Brain’s Way of Healing, Norman Doidge, footnote p 345) This effect, I believe is an example of local entanglement (a+b)=1 and one could take this further, in that ‘they played back the pattern of the brain waves firing. Amazingly, they found that the sound waves from the Mozart piece and the brain waves that they triggered looked the same. They even found that the brain waves in the brain stem sounded the same as the music that triggered them!’ (p 346) Again, ‘One distinctive property of waves is diffraction, the bending of waves when they encounter an obstacle or aperture. Davisson and Germer showed that this happens to electrons striking a piece of metal.’ (Physics in the 20^th Century, Curt Suplee, p 66) This suggests that local entanglement is far more pervasive than first thought and its effect on music is so widespread that it deserves more attention.

 

These quotations say that there is necessarily a relation between logical and physical properties and, I believe that this predicts the entanglement of (a+b)=1, (a and b)=1 and ‘+/and’. In other words, everything is quested all the time, and further, Life has used this fundamental relationship to evolve a mind-space that forms the physical part of the placebo effect, but necessarily allows logic/organization to be caught up in the mix.

 

It should be noted that every process above, rests/builds on a quest and involves, the Big Whoosh, the probability space and the fifth dimension and appears to make a tight/consistent theory. However, science is in need of a rethink, and so I will leave the definition of the mind at that point and look at our ability to access the mind through the brain. It should be kept in mind that this derivation is a theory that is bottom-up and totally dependant on the definition of the fifth dimension of a probability space.

 

Part 2: Accessing the Mind

 

I should point out that the (special case) mathematics is a counting space (a+b), compared to the measuring space (a+b)=1 of general mathematics and mirrors the past view of the brain by science that the brain is a machine and this fact of top-down thinking needs to be turned into a bottom-up picture. This goes against the specialist/specialized thinking of the academics and requires a generalist’s view to comprehend a complicated machine/organization that evolved over 3,000 million years. Putting this idea another way, the mind has accessed a new space (concept/context) that overarches and includes the physical (measurement/entanglement) and Life itself.

 

For brevity, to set the stage, from the abstract of chapter 84, ‘Life, as a parasite, evolved a mind/brain over 3,000 million years by creating a new space using multicellular organisms and a Mathematics of the Mind that is an improvement on the measurement/entanglement of a probability space to enhance its survival/success rate. General mathematics is open-ended and supplies answers of context as well as concept to all disciplines of knowledge by expanding the existing mathematics that is based on a counting space and the four axioms of the mind/brain. Given that all mathematics are ‘hand-maidens’, general mathematics extends the range to include all disciplines and examples are given of solutions of long-standing enigmas.’

 

The derivation of the four axioms, quoted above, are available from chapter 81: ‘The Math Book, (by Clifford A. Pickover, p 284) gives the five Peano Axioms as a basis of arithmetic, and certain things appeared to be missing, such as the mind/brain to determine elegance of content, forward planning (dimension 6), the measurement of each numeral (questing) and the relationship between numerals (relevance)’.

 

Further, ‘If we unfold (a+b)=1 in a probability space, as above, including Life, we get:

concept/forward-planning/quest/relevance/beauty/context.

 

If we unfold (a+b)=1 in a probability space, as above, excluding Life, we get:

measurement/quest/relevance/entanglement.

 

Notice that forward-planning is a dimension specific to Life and necessary for the predator/prey basis of iteration and the four axioms are immediately obvious in the above.’

 

‘From chapter 85, ‘the mathematics of concepts assumes/needs, just as mathematics does, the use of the four axioms: elegance, forward-planning, questing and relevance as the basis of context/organization that is used by the mind in assigning the ‘numbers’/importance to the context. Notice also, that the context has to be numericalized and that shows that context is crucial to decisions and yet, that is precisely the part that we tend to ignore/under-use in day-to-day decisions.’

 

To illustrate this numericalization with an example of the workings of the brain, ‘the map-like projection of the body’s motor units upon the motor cortex, which creates a “homunculus” of associated cortical motor neurons. The parts of the body that have the greatest number of individual motor units (as opposed to the largest bulk of muscle tissue) have the largest representation in the cortex. The muscles of the hand and of vocalization have the most motor units, because they require the greatest precision in control.’ (Job’s Body: a handbook for bodywork, Deane Juhan, p 135)

 

This quotation shows an organization that is derived from general mathematics, in that the homunculus is a concept/context diagram straight from the definition of the mathematics of concepts. This statement makes a bottom-up statement/description of the homunculus that places it in context because the words, toes, ankle, knee, hip, trunk, shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand etc., are the concepts and the size of the drawing, or separation of the words represents the context. I should also add that within the workings of the brain, discrete areas of the brain are allocated to discrete concepts/lobes, such as the visual etc. that are in the form of the mathematics of concepts.

 

I believe that this example shows that 3,000 million years of evolution has evolved the most efficient organization of our brain through the mathematics of iteration (evolution) and that is the mathematics of concepts that is apparent from the fifth dimension (a+b)=1, where a and b are measurement/records. So basic/simple/far-reaching is the mathematics of concepts, that I will give the general form from chapter 75 is ‘if we take the Cartesian system of the X-Y plane, we can say that some point is composed of two independent variables (x, y), and the mathematics of concepts can be handled similarly, bearing in mind that an iteration or mind/brain initiates a measurement and we are dealing with world O and world P. A little foreshadowing will make it easier to understand, that world P is a probability space and only has iteration, whereas Life has made world O into a “determinate”/non-entanglement world because of the necessity of creating a reality as part of questing/Survival-of-the-Fittest.’

 

Further, ‘taking the easy case of world P, questing is: X-Y axes with the concepts to be examined spread equally spaced along the X axis, and a curve/^ is drawn between each concept and every other concept with a height ^ equal to its probability and the sum of all the “heights” is 1. This comes straight from the entanglement/measurement of the probabilities in a probability space. To move it into world O in order to automate or use a mind/brain, move the concepts and the ^ to make a “normal” curve and read off the best concepts and their context. If this looks simple, ask yourself “why should it be complicated?”, when the universe requires only 5 dimensions and life six dimensions.’

 

Coming back to the brain using a different context, ‘for four hundred years, the mainstream view of the brain was that it could not change; scientists thought the brain was like a glorious machine, with parts, each of which performed a single mental function, in a single location in the brain. If a location was damaged – by a stroke or an injury or a disease – it could not be fixed because machines cannot repair themselves or grow new parts.’ (The Brain’s Way of Healing, Norman Doidge, p xi) This seemed sensible if we think of the neurons as concepts and the dendrites as context as well as the fact that neurons must be immortal, simply because it is not in the organism’s interest to forget things totally. I believe that the weakening of the connections (of the neurotransmitters) produces a subconsciousness that can be reinstated as conditions return to those existing at the time that they were laid down and this is another heritable ‘sense’ that we possess (chapters 10 and 11).

 

Thus, Life has changed measurement/entanglement into concept/context and the neuron is a living entity and can only function to provide the dendrites, but taken another way, the dendrites are the context and the totality of a set of dendrites is the concept and is a memory. Compare this to, ‘while organs such as the skin, liver, and blood could repair themselves by replenishing their lost cells using stem cells to function as “replacement parts”, no such cells were found in the brain, despite decades of searching. Once neurons were lost, no evidence could be found that they were ever replaced… Even if neuronal stem cells – baby neurons – could be found, how, it was wondered, would they be of any help? How would they integrate into the sophisticated but dizzyingly complex circuits of the brain? (p xiii)

 

The problem posed above is how to insert a given memory into the cortex, and this was considered previously (chapters 8 to 11) and logic dictates that it must be an iterative process that involves repetition until a sufficiently close approximation is found, and this is borne out experimentally. From chapter 11, ‘when the rat goes to sleep, it begins to replay the maze-pattern sequence. The animal’s brain replays what it learned while it slumbers … Always executing the pattern in a specific stage of sleep, the rat repeats it over and over again – and much faster than during the day. The rate is so furious, the sequence is replayed thousands of times.’ (Brain rules, John Medina, p 164)

 

Further, I have mentioned previously that the mind/brain is an improvement on iteration, and we see it again where the iteration that places ‘real’ memories can also use the mind itself to memorize abstract memories. This is the act of thinking and, I believe that it uses the four searching axioms of the mind, that are necessary for survival and the action potential stream, similar to those from the senses, to hold memories and, in time, place them in the cortex. This is thinking abstractly, learning and storing thoughts for later use.

 

It is important to remember that the four search/thinking axioms are simple, when known, but they were derived from Life, the properties of the probability space that is our universe and questing the fifth dimension. However, they are, by definition (at least) part of the structure of the general mathematics that the mind/brain is built on, and should be available to the mind. The physical world has an iterative/action-potential means of retaining memories and the mind/brain, I believe, has a similar method, however, it also uses the four axioms and this means that the mind can influence the brain using abstract thought using general mathematics instead of only the mathematics of concepts. In other words, the ability of the mind to influence the brain (body) using abstract thoughts requires the general mathematics because there must be forward-planning of the thought/memory, relevance of the importance of the thought, questing the alternatives and deciding its elegance. In a ‘nut shell’, general mathematics is the process that the mind and body use to communicate and it does this, I believe, iteratively with the mathematics of concepts and abstractly using the four axioms.

 

This builds on the earlier chapters of the placebo/nocebo effect (chapter 50), where the body is an organization and there must be a two-way conversation between the mind and the body (context) composed of minute cells and control is necessarily vested in the mind (concept). This is the explanation of the placebo/nocebo effect and how the cells entered a new space under the control of the mind/brain but the connection between brain and body is a simple connection. However, ‘I have never seen the changes for pain based on hypnosis or suggestion last longer than a week or so.’ (The Brain’s Way of Healing, Norman Doidge, p 27) ‘Moskowitz’s patients’ pattern of change is also consistent with what we see when the brain learns a new skill, like playing a musical instrument or learning a language. The time frame is typical of what I have seen in significant neuroplastic change: the change occurred over weeks (often six to eight weeks) and required daily mental practice. Its hard work.’ (p 28)

 

Looking at ‘acute pain alerts us to injury or disease by sending a signal to the brain …. When the neurons in our pain maps get damaged, they fire incessant false alarms, making us believe the problem is in our body when it is mostly in our brain. Long after the body has healed, the pain system is still firing. The acute pain has developed an afterlife: it becomes chronic pain.’ (p 4) ‘In processing acute pain, only about 5 percent of the neurons in that area are dedicated to processing pain. In chronic pain, the constant firing and wiring lead to an increase, so that 10 to 20 percent of the neurons in the area are now dedicated to pain processing.’ (p 14)

 

‘The brain can shut pain off because the actual function of acute pain is not to torment us but to alert us to danger’ (p 4), and the function of the mind is to control/do-the-best for the body using the concept/context space. Plasticity is the use it or lose it function that is crucial to competition and making the organism the most efficient that it can be, and this competition for brain space is no different and overlays ‘body image’. ‘The body image is formed in the mind and is represented in the brain, then is unconsciously projected onto the body. Neuroscientists sometimes call it the “virtual body” to emphasize that it has an existence in the brain and mind that is independent of the physical body.’ (p 22)

 

‘Jan … and Moskowitz did a very specific form of visualization: they imagined that the area of the brain devoted to processing pain was shrinking…. hypnotists often use it to bring about pain relief, by asking patients to imagine that the area in pain is shrinking, or fading, or further away. Put in neuroscientific terms, the hypnotists are actually getting their clients to experiment not with their physical bodies but with the subjective image they have of their bodies in their minds, what clinicians call the “body image”. (p 21)

 

The purpose of this example is to show that abstract thought applied to the body image map/homunculus is the basic reason that the proliferation of pain receptors brought about by the body’s neuroplasticity can be reduced by using an application of the mind and hard work. The definition of the workings of the mind and recording the result in the brain/body changes the body image that neuroplasticity blew out of proportion. In other words, the basic problem is that neuroplasticity is controlled by iteration/evolution, or, if we consciously intervene, we have to decide, using our mind/brain to derive an answer that fits a wider context, namely, Survival of the Best.

 

I would like to consider the following quotation, ‘the latest brain scan research shows that when the placebo effect occurs in pain patients, or in patients with depression, the changes in the brain are almost identical to those that occur when they get better with medication. Clinicians and scientists who study mind-body medicine argue if we could develop a way of systematically activating the brain circuitry that underlies the placebo effect, it would represent a huge medical breakthrough.’ (p 26)

 

The second part of the quotation suggests that there is brain circuitry that can be tapped, as there is, but the idea of an organization of many cells all being connected to, and receiving messages from a mind that is a new space (‘+/and’) that evolved from measurement/entanglement is a great enough achievement, I believe, and so I am content to call this simple interaction the placebo/nocebo pathway (chapter 50). The first part of the quotation is similar, but different and more controversial.

 

From above, it was considered that an entanglement exists between ‘+’ and ‘and’ to make a space and the entanglement (a+b)=1 is local/physical such as found in diffraction, in (a and b)=1 as gravity/logic and between “+’ and ‘and’ as something that links physical and logical and maintains that relationship. In essence, I am saying that in a measuring space there has to be a relationship between the physical and logical that is sensible if one or the other changes because a physical space is a simple space that allows things to change by physical/logical laws (world P) without the context/concepts that we use in world (our) O. This is the magic of placebo, miracle cures and medicine because each must change the psychological and the physical in a way that ‘allows’ (physically and logically) a cure or relief of symptoms.

 

This independence/orthogonality is saying that, like the Cartesian coordinates (x, y), there will be combinations of the physical and logical in each and every factor. The effectiveness of placebo is significant because ‘if a pain patient is given a sugar pill instead of real medication, or injections that consist only of salt water (saline) instead of anesthetic, at least 30 percent will report significant pain relief.’ (p 26) Thus, it is apparent that placebo is a legitimate procedure that logically makes physical changes to the body and is equivalent to medicine in making physical changes that logically affect the mind/body. ‘Placebos can be used to treat pain, depression, arthritis, irritable bowel, ulcers, and a wide range of illnesses. But it doesn’t work for all illnesses – cancer, or viruses, or schizophrenia, for instance.’ (p 26) The placebo/nocebo continuum links the bodies’ cells to the brain and mind and the mind is linked to the brain and all the cells and this communication (and effect) is the placebo, but cancer cells are cells that do not obey the mind/body, likewise viruses are both dependent (for growth) and independent (uncontrolled) of the mind/body. Schizophrenia, on the other hand, is a way of thinking and provides variation that contributes to competition and is a natural part of survival of the fittest and competition/death (context) is the only way to judge its suitability (concept).

 

Taking this further, it provides a means of reconciling Eastern, Western and Homeopathic methods because the placebo/nocebo effect is a large part of cures, but it also answers why the physical approach of Western Medicine, the energy of Eastern Medicine and, of course, medicines/herbs effect a cure or, at least alleviate symptoms. Taking this further, any attention/interest makes people feel better and, from above, makes physical and psychological changes and suggests the Mandrake effect.

 

Conclusion: the mind/brain appears to have evolved as a parasite using various bits and pieces of the physical world P and has built new spaces where it could, to enhance its efficiency at survival. The structure of the space shows that new ‘powers’, such as the Mandrake effect can be found, by using a bottom up approach. Exploiting the physical spaces might be useful, but there is so much that needs to be rationalized. ‘No paradigm is perfect at describing the way the world is, and so, over time, some of the paradigm’s inadequacies become apparent, and then a scientific revolution occurs and the existing paradigm is replaced by the new paradigm.’ (p 354) That time should be fast approaching.

 

To show how appropriately the above fits into the theory, let us unfold (a+b)=1, where unfolding is following the questing [of quantum mechanics, evolution, business etc.]. The fifth dimension (a+b)=1, in this simple form produces five operators (ignoring, for the moment, the fact that the speed of light is an absolute and must be constant, that the energy per unit of space is constant and the law of conservation of minimum energy):

(a) measurement/entanglement that are local physical and independent/orthogonal (a+b)=1 [classical local action and reaction of matter that provides expansion of the universe, reflection, diffraction of light and water waves],

(b) measurement/entanglement that are universe-wide logical and independent/orthogonal (a and b)=1 [conservation of (zero) energy across the universe, gravity, creation of space/mass/energy/time through the Lorentz contraction],

(c) measurement/entanglement that are local physical and independent/orthogonal, (a+b) [local/personal appreciation], and

(d) measurement/entanglement that are universe-wide logical and independent/orthogonal (a and b) [universal/reality-wide appreciation]

(e) measurement/entanglement that links the operators ‘+’ and ‘and’ together in the fundamental relationship that links the physical/logical/organizational [mind-space, conservation of minimum energy]

 

This expansion/quest of the fifth dimension seems to answer the problems and enigmas that have accumulated throughout mathematics and physics and calls for a rethink of what is being taught.

 

References: all quotations are fully referenced in the body and earlier chapters can be found on    darrylpenney.com    if required.

 

Chapter 85: General Mathematics, the Three Fundamental Quests, the Law of Conservation of Energy and its the Strange Effect on the Theory of Relativity, a Number of Enigmas are Explained, Creating a New Evolution Using Plato’s Politics and Developing the Concept of the ‘Second Coming’.

 

Chapter 84: Occam’s Razor, Principle of Least Action, Why a Particle Travels in a Straight Line, Why Science is Flawed, a Mathematical Giggle and the Derivation of Everything.

 

Chapter 81: Parasites in Probability Space, General Mathematics, Logic, Measurement, Organization, the Four Axioms of Measurement that Link the Mind/brain to Mathematics and the Dimensions of a Probability Space, Life as a Possible Sixth Dimension, the Why of Godel’s Incompleteness Theorems and the Goal of Explaining Everything by a Single, Elegant, Unified Equation is Attained.

 

Chapter 78: Love, Beauty, Ecstasy, the Golden Ratio and the Reason that Sexual Selection Works.

 

Chapter 75: The Nature of Life and Logic, Newton Laws of Motion, Reflection and Diffraction.

 

Chapter 50: The ‘Death Gene’ and How to Re-set it, Alzheimer’s Disease and the ‘Placebo Connection’

 

Chapter 8: The Brain.

 

Chapter 9: The Brain and Mind.

 

Chapter 10: Creative Thinking – the Ninth Sense.

 

Chapter 11: Changing your Mind – the Seventh Sense.