Chapter 66: The Theory of Everything, the Philosophers’ Stone and the Second Coming/Chance
Abstract: This is the Theory of Everything and the probability space that we live in is relative, and absolute goals must be assigned if we are to take control of our evolution (Plato’s problem). Consciousness provides the basis of everything from the Big Bang (of Consciousness) through evolution of consciousness/mind/brain/body, and is the fifth dimension CEN (mathematics of concepts/entanglement/measurement). The Theory of Everything is apt because we are ‘players’ defining a logical future through the fifth dimension on the ‘stage’ of space-time, further, if it is the Theory of Everything, we will be able to link the Big Bang with quantum mechanics, and that is done. An example is given of the logic of force fields and in particular that gravity is propagated instantaneously without the need of gravitons or gravitational waves. The Philosophers’ stone represents Man’s aspirations without realizing adequate goals and the world is now in an Extinction Event, but the use of a general mathematics of concepts will allow agreed goals to be set and implemented and could produce a Second Coming/Chance. An example is given showing that politics and the lack of goals is reducing political leadership to a level that is promoting an extinction event.
This chapter is a derivation of a fundamental ‘continuum’ that requires amalgamation of parts of commonly used academic disciplines such as physics/chemistry/philosophy/botany/nutrition/mathematics and so on because there are no absolutes of disciplines (1). Everything is linked together by entanglement and nothing can exist without reference to everything else as shown by the mathematics of concepts and this makes a statement that ‘generalists’ are as necessary as ‘specialists’ in the academic world. This chapter could be considered as an abstract/condensation of the derivation of the preceding 65 chapters, and secondly, that ‘physics/chemistry/philosophy/botany/nutrition/mathematics and so on’ will not change because they are subsets within the mathematics of concepts and the fifth dimension.
Philosophy
I want to repeat a quotation given at the beginning of the book because I need to define a context. “When we talk about mathematics,” [John von Neumann] wrote towards the end of his life, ”we may be discussing a secondary language, built on the primary language truly used by our central nervous system.” (The Shallows, Nicholas Carr p 176) Mathematics is a special case (the secondary language) that is a subset of a completely general mathematics of concepts (primary language) that is used by our cortex. That is why nothing will change except our understanding and to illustrate, let me say that Isaac Newton is reputed to have watched an apple drop and deduced that the apple is accelerating and secondly, is moving towards the centre of the earth and that’s how the Theory of Gravity evolved with acceleration to the centre of mass.
I agree with that, but, I am saying one extra fundamental thing: that the apple is repeating its motion, and that repetition is a form of consciousness and Consciousness, which is logic, is everywhere when we look at the universe in the correct way and it is called the fifth dimension. Everything is attracted to everything else (Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity) otherwise there would not be planets/suns/us and the potential energy of gravity is part of the Conservation of Energy in our universe and thus is propagated instantly. No gravitons, no gravitational waves, no wondering about speed – its all about simplicity, and that is a simple solution of the mathematics of concepts (Occam’s razor). Notice the change in context from the ‘physical’ (our world O) to the logical (world O and P).
Physics/mathematics
In the beginning, there need not be anything, but the probability of existence always exists, and forms a reality (2) because it is continuous and complete and contains certainty of existence (at 1). A mathematical probability space comprises 3 space, time passing and a+b=1 (where a and b are two measurements, for simplicity), our world (O) has 3 space, time interval and acknowledgement of a fifth dimension (Kaluza and Klein) (3) and the universe (P), I maintain, has 3 space, time passing and CEM (mathematics of concepts/entanglement/measurement) (4).
The Big Bang produced Consciousness (potential/heat/unknown energy), that has a minimum of two states (energy/mass) (5), changing in time to Consciousness (potential energy etc.) to Consciousness (mass etc.), that is, physics (energy to mass), chemistry (mass to atoms/molecules) and finally to biology (life). Consciousness (big C) is over-arching, whereas consciousness (little c) is the usual definition of being able to ‘think’. The equation a+b=1 has no absolute (unique) solution and leads to a+b=a+c where a,b and c are measurements/observers and b=c for a speed of light a, which is the result of the Michelson-Morley experiment (6). This enigma (that the speed of light is the same for observers moving/accelerating relative to each other) is thus necessary in a probability space because everything is relative to the measurer. Einstein used (some) of this result in his Special Theory of Relativity (7), but it is crucial to recognise that his theory was the relation between b and c, and not that b=c for a measurement, which is more fundamental.
Notice that Einstein assumed a probability universe (in line with Michelson-Morley) and a probability space has no absolutes, only relativities (a+b=1) (unlike a universe that really really exists) and that relativity produces Plato’s problem of no absolute (8). We have to define an absolute to have a goal, and that was Socrates’ solution (‘know yourself’) (9) because we must define an absolute and that (probably) needs a formal mathematics of concepts for everyone to be able to agree on an absolute/goal.
Further, a probability space/universe contains the ‘proof’ of the postulate of the Conservation of Energy (Consciousness) because a+b=1, whereas an absolute space/universe need not have conservation. The Theory of Everything contains Everything ‘played out’ by logic figures (that are us!) because how else are decisions to be made. It is sensible/logical that we evolved a reality in a probability of existence space because conservation exists but we do not need to really really exist, and that makes things/life a lot easier and simpler.
The mathematics of concepts is general and contains all the answers, but not exact, because of its very nature and obviously accords with Godel’s incompleteness theorem (10) and simple solutions are proverbs and I would like to introduce ‘where there is smoke, there is fire’. Now, we know that this is not really true, but we can use it as a ‘pointer’ to look at concepts that have been neglected because they may be the ‘nuggets’ that show where current theories are not inclusive. In particular, the uncertainty between position and momentum (delta x times delta p is greater than or equal to h bar/2) and Heisenberg’s time uncertainty principle (delta E times delta t is greater than or equal to h bar) (11) are well known, but not used much.
So, we start with a ‘spark’ of Consciousness (Big Bang) that is pure Consciousness (potential/heat/unknown energy) but there is an uncertainty relation, above, between energy and time, so time is created along with energy and ‘expansion’ proceeds at some rate (perhaps called ‘inflation’) and produces ‘cooling’, and when matter is created, the uncertainty, above, creates space and so on. This is a simple theory, but it is interesting that it ‘links’ the Big Bang with quantum mechanics and it links them simply, as we should expect (Occam’s razor). If we consider the tunnel effect, that a particle can be in classically ‘impossible’ positions’, the fact that it can, could be thought of as a wave packet ‘width’, or, turning that mechanistic approach to a logical basis, there must be ‘room’ to accommodate the possibility and so energy creates time and a particle creates space. To repeat, a probability space is a measuring space that must be able to accommodate ‘possibilities’ (12).
It is interesting that the same process could cause a Consciousness (energy) ‘packet’ that we call a photon, to generate time and space, that could be a speed that is indeterminate until measured and any measurement is relative to the measurer. It is a simple explanation, but it allows the possibility within a Theory of Everything and a probability space is a simple space. Occam’s razor stresses simplicity, so it may form a logical explanation to the Big Bang and why light moves, and move it must if we are to survive. There is also the multiverse selection logic (the strength of gravity and the speed of light are two requirements) because we have been able to evolve in this universe and reality doesn’t care whether we exist or not exist, as long as we measure and choose.
It is tempting to ask ‘What caused the Big Bang?’, and again, there should be an answer, so, it could be possible that as it is acknowledged in (11) that virtual particles ‘pop’ into existence in empty space and if that space is a probability space (of Consciousness), a virtual particle of Consciousness is created, and that is, of course, a Big Bang. It should be remembered that ‘time passing’ is required in probability space (P) and that has nothing to do with a time interval in world (O). Intriguingly, our universe might exit in a Big Blink at any time! (Chapter 27)
From Chapter 29 ‘a gravitational field has a magnitude that we need for us to exist on our planet and changes continually so that the result is the conservation of energy over the entire universe and is a measure of the potential energy of two points with respect to a third point (potential well) and requires a mind to determine it and use it.
What is the current thinking on the subject of gravity? ‘In Physics, the graviton is a hypothetical elementary particle that mediates the force of gravitation in the framework of quantum field theory. If it exists, the graviton is expected to be massless (because the gravitational force appears to have unlimited range) and must be a spin-2 boson.’ (Wikipedia, Graviton) Further, ‘in physics, gravitational waves are ripples in the curvature of space-time that propagates as a wave, travelling outwards from the source. Predicted in 1916 by Albert Einstein to exist on the basis of general relativity, gravitational waves theoretically transport energy as gravitational radiation.’ (Wikipedia, Gravitational wave)’
Force is a world O concept, as is the acceleration due to gravity because force requires a time interval and this invokes a measurement (F = (mv-mu)/t) whereas in world P we have uninterrupted impulse interactions (Ft = (mv-mu)) and gravity can be thought of as a Consciousness (potential energy). The speed of changes of all forms of energy must be instantaneous across the universe otherwise breaches of logic would occur to the Conservation of Energy, thus the speed of gravity is instantaneous. Notice that the effect of gravity (Consciousness (potential)) can be thought of as energy and not as a force and that means that no particles or waves are involved, only the Conservation of Energy.
Biology
Notice also that Consciousness is a continuum because no absolutes exist in our universe and it can be seen that the Big-Bang/physics/chemistry/biology lead-into/form-the-start-of that continuum. There can be no point at which consciousness is/was attained, only points of progression and the major turning point occurred, I believe, in the Cambrian when fossils appeared. Cells are limited in size because of the thickness of the cell wall (can’t go back, Rule of Life (13)), but they made/evolved a contract to form multi-celled organisms (placebo/nocebo (14)) that increased in size, allowed the use of lensed eyes and a greater degree of consciousness with the formation of the mind/brain. Notice that this ability to see produced a need to plan attacks and larger teeth/bones/armour/consciousness that led to fossils being produced.
This Cambrian scenario added impetus to Survival of the Fittest (S/F), that had been continuing from chemistry, and evolution produced untold numbers of organisms of all types, but consciousness is one thing and the body is another and both had to evolve, but the body depends on its food supply and the mind has no separate existence, so they have to work together. Firstly, the reference to ‘untold numbers of organisms’ was made to show that life is a computer (biocomputer) and it is the only way that logic can produce a result. This is important because, in the same way that memories are laid down in the cortex (by logic iteration), there is no other way to determine a logical outcome (15). We, ourselves, are evolving a future in the probability of existence space because we can.
Nutrition
Secondly, ‘consciousness is one thing and the body is another and both had to evolve’ needs a little explaining for consciousness is evolving over the continuum, but the body lags behind as genes are slow to change, though epigenetics picks up the ‘pace’. A significant ‘point’, I believe, occurred 60 million years ago when primates used hunter/gatherer/farming to avail the body of luxurious amounts of phytochemicals and the modern degenerative ‘diseases’ (contrasting the types of diseases in mid-Victorian times when people lived as long as we do) (16), in my opinion, are a result of the very restricted modern diet. The modern ‘diseases include cancer, heart ‘disease’, Alzheimer’s disease, depression and so on. Notice that an absolute (of content, Plato) has to be assigned to be our goal in feeding our body, and it needs to be based on how we ate in the Palaeolithic, and further, the second Law of Life requires not just food, but a combination of state of mind/exercise/nutrition (17).
Politics
A measurement can be made by iteration or a mind/brain because it is the fifth dimension and there is nothing else to do the job (only space-time is left) and measurement is a+b=1 because the sum of a measurement at every point must equal 1, overall. Notice that this statement contains entanglement because a change in one point influences every other point. The mathematics of concepts must be available because it is a setting up of concepts ready for a comparison, that is iteration, and that involves choice and is logic and so it is not surprising that our mind/brain is based on the Mathematics of the Mind (general mathematics of concepts relating to us and our mind).
Consciousness changes, not so much over time, but with the state of mind and especially about how the mind handles logic. The next ‘milestone’ for consciousness/mind is the evolution from hunter/gather/farmer to farmer and that’s when it all started to go wrong. Consciousness changed from S/F to Survival of the Best (S/B) (mathematics) because we decided what we should grow and eat and we needed mathematics to count the production/marketing. This led us into an Extinction Event for many of the animals on the planet, and even extending to ourselves (global warming). I believe that mathematics, that caused the problem through technology, is a special case of the general mathematics of concepts and that it has been used without assigning appropriate goals (Plato’s problem) and that has left us in an Extinction Event (18).
What’s stopping us turning the aspirations of humanity (Philosophers’ stone) into the flowering of the Second Coming/Chance? The short answer is not recognising/using the mathematics of concepts. The police force forms a reality, the justice system is based on the Mathematics of the Mind but politics needs changing because it lacks consistent realistic goals (Plato’s problem) and a simple example should suffice. Over-population is the basic problem and giving social security to those with no/one children/child and letting those with more children (determination to breed, orgene (19)) be supported by their children, aligns firstly, with ‘determination/pain evolved a reality from the probability of existence’ and secondly, with S/B (mathematics of concepts) that the Best are able/richer/successful and should have more children (20). At the moment, social security tends to ‘cloud’ the political scene in two ways, firstly, the people on social security are mostly not the Best, and secondly, because those that gain from social security are allowed a full vote, which is ludicrous in the light of the proverb (a simple solution of the mathematics of concepts) that ‘if you benefit from it, you can’t vote for it’.
Religion
Tribal myths/teachings are a necessary part of our evolution underwritten by the need for females (in the main) to move to a new tribe to counteract inbreeding and these myths/teachings define family life and the way to survive in the tribe (third Law of Life). A mathematical/logical operator (Logic of the Half-truth) (21) is needed to define our world out of chaos and that is Truth and there is a place for a God of Truth if one needs a personal god. In my opinion/guess, the original Trinity, based on the three Laws of Life was used to explain (Chapter 1) the world of several thousand years ago and because the environment was to be used to eke out a precarious living, the second Law of Life (Holy Spirit) was ‘lost’. Now that technology can change the world, we need to reinstate the true meaning/position of the environment/Holy Spirit into the teachings of the Churches to preserve/protect the environment.
Prediction
Finally, a prediction is necessary, because, as I have said before, the ‘shifting sands’ of the mathematics of concepts needs a ‘reason to be’ else why go to the trouble? However, I now realize a more fundamental reason and that is Plato’s problem, that we must have an ultimate/absolute aim and as we are ‘players’ in the ‘theatre’ of space-time, the aim is our choice/iteration that comes via the mathematics of concepts. We can behave as they did in Sodom and Gomorrah, or, we can do as we have been doing by allowing politics to foster/support aggrandisement of politicians, which has led us into an Extinction Event, or, we can get behind a formal/absolute aim that carries/drives our evolution in the direction that iteration carried it, and that is, towards a Survival of the Best.
Perhaps a Golden-Age/Second-Coming is possible as listed above, but, similar to Sodom and Gomorrah, are there enough determined people to implement it? Perhaps I should hope for the best/Best and finish the chapters that suggest methods of attaining a modern Survival of the Best.
Notes/explanations
The above is new and is entitled The Theory of Everything because it is the fifth dimension and includes mathematics, speech, concepts etc., and in fact anything that is not space-time. These concepts have been used for a long time, but, I believe, have not been considered to be part of experiments. I also believe that force fields, gravity etc. are logical and will try to elaborate on the terms used, but I fear that I’ll only be introducing more strange concepts.
This book is, like Aristotle’s work, a personal journey and the journey will change your outlook/mind, so, as a final word, start at the beginning. Reviewers will not be able to use their existing expertise and I suggest a team from a university. To give an example, the general mathematics of concepts is based on Organisational Change Theory in Business Administration taught at the University of Canberra and many times I asked myself ‘Is this mathematics there/real/useful?’ and I believe that similar to microwaves left over from the Big Bang, there are clues, but they are subtle, but somehow a slight change of view opens up vast insights, as the Michelson-Morley experiment did above.
To repeat, I believe that I have shown/proved that specialists have their place and so do generalists, and the best/only options are a team of specialists or that someone starts at the beginning of the book. It is not difficult, just different.
(1) The mathematics of concepts sets up a formal array of concepts as attractors in Chaos theory that can never be accessed, but we are looking between the concepts (because there are no absolute concepts) and I am suggesting that ‘physics/chemistry/philosophy/botany/nutrition/mathematics and so on’ are part of the continuum of Consciousness. They are separate because people (world O) like-to/have-to specialise their interests.
(2) A reality is extremely important, whereas existence is not, because a reality is necessary for an organism to be able to live/exist/breed in an environment, otherwise it dies, and it needs to live long enough to breed so as to be part of the computation/Survival-of-the-Fittest/produce-a-result.
(3) (Kaluza-Klein Theory, Wikipedia): ‘In physics, Kaluza–Klein theory (KK theory) is a unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism built around the idea of a fifth dimension beyond the usual four of space and time. It is considered to be an important precursor to string theory’. What I am proposing is a unified field theory based on logic and whilst the aim is similar, the forms are completely different.
(4) Just as quantum mechanics use to consider the wave/particle duality, I believe that the fifth dimension is composed of several parts, and show ‘faces’ of mathematics of concepts/entanglement/measurement (CEM) at various times as needed. It is the property of a probability space that they are the same thing, but world O units are not the same as world P units and the same applies to concepts. The basic difference is time, because world O needs a time interval for the predator/prey situation, and that changes an impulse into a force which constitutes/initiates a measurement.
(5) If we are a naturally occurring ‘playing out’ of the future, a computer, whether mathematical, uses 0 and 1 (processor), north and south (memory) or yes and no (logical), needs two ‘states’, or for our universe, energy and mass. Energy and mass are such states and E=mc2 is a world O units converter. Another simple example is that the energy of a photon is proportional to its frequency and this is the mechanism of entanglement that the frequency/energy changes with potential energy movements to sum to 1 overall.
(6) Michelson-Morley experiment, Wikipedia) The Michelson–Morley experiment was performed over the spring and summer of 1887 by Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley at what is now Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, and published in November of the same year. It compared the speed of light in perpendicular directions, in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter through the stationary luminiferous aether (“aether wind”). The negative results are generally considered to be the first strong evidence against the then-prevalent aether theory, and initiated a line of research that eventually led to special relativity, in which the stationary aether concept has no role. The experiment has been referred to as “the moving-off point for the theoretical aspects of the Second Scientific Revolution”.’
(7) From chapter 27, ‘Einstein’s theory of special relativity results from two statements – the two basic postulates of special relativity: 1. The speed of light is the same for all observers, no matter what their relative speeds. 2. The laws of physics are the same in any inertial (that is, non accelerated) frame of reference. This means that the laws of physics observed by a hypothetical observer travelling with a relativistic particle must be the same as those observed by an observer who is stationary in the laboratory.’ ((pages.towson.edu/zrerev/conceptual/14.htm) From the first postulate (a relation b)=(a relation c) where a is the speed of light and b and c are observers is similar, given that Occam’s razor is a solution of the mathematics of concepts, suggesting that the simplest solution is the most likely, and that from probability space that (a+b)=(a+c), suggests that we reside in a probability space where observers a and b are equivalent. Measurement is the deciding factor and a probability space is a ‘measuring’ space at all points, at all times.
(8) From chapter 63 ‘. Plato appears to be troubled by this problem: ‘in the first book of the Republic (332-3). If good living is a skill or art, what is it the skill to do? There seems no way of specifying the skill as ”the skill to do x“ without making it also the skill to do the opposite of x’. (Greek Philosophers, R. M. Hare, p 127)
(9) ‘”Know thyself”, advised Socrates …. Empathy is one of our greatest hopes for doing so’ (The Wonderbox, Roman Krznaric, p 53)
(10) ‘A number of scholars claim that Gödel’s incompleteness theorem suggests that any attempt to construct a Theory of Everything is bound to fail. Gödel’s theorem, informally stated, asserts that any formal theory expressive enough for elementary arithmetical facts to be expressed and strong enough for them to be proved is either inconsistent (both a statement and its denial can be derived from its axioms) or incomplete, in the sense that there is a true statement that can’t be derived in the formal theory’. (Wickapedia, Theory of Everything, Arguments against a theory of everything, Godel’s incompleteness theorem) The word is ‘incomplete’ because in the mathematics of concepts EVERYTHING is incomplete and an answer is built up by iteration, which is necessarily incomplete in the limit.
(11) ‘It is sometimes attempted to provide an intuitive picture of virtual particles based upon the Heisenberg energy-time uncertainty principle(with ΔE and Δt being the energy and time variations respectively; ΔE is the accuracy in the measurement of energy and Δt is the time taken in the measurement, and ħ is the Planck constant divided by 2π) arguing along the lines that the short lifetime of virtual particles allows the “borrowing” of large energies from the vacuum and thus permits particle generation for short times.[18]
Although the phenomenon of virtual particles is accepted, this interpretation of the energy-time uncertainty relation is not universal. One issue is the use of an uncertainty relation limiting measurement accuracy as though a time uncertainty Δt determines a “budget” for borrowing energy ΔE. Another issue is the meaning of “time” in this relation, because energy and time (unlike position q and momentum p, for example) do not satisfy a canonical commutation relation (such as [q, p] = i ħ). Various schemes have been advanced to construct an observable that has some kind of time interpretation, and yet does satisfy a canonical commutation relation with energy. The very many approaches to the energy-time uncertainty principle are a long and continuing subject.’ (Wikipedia,Vacuum state, Virtual particles)
(12) From chapter 27, ‘cosmologists have accepted that “about 380,000 years after the Big Bang, the universe had cooled enough to allow the formation of hydrogen atoms”. (http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/db275/Cosmology/Chapter2, p 32)
We observe this event (inflation) where the speed of expansion of the universe for 380,000 years increased by 60 fold in the early part of the expansion that then appears to have suddenly reverted to normal when particles appeared. How strange!
My simple model, says that time was created by the potential energy of the certainty of a universe being able to be created, and remembering that time is a half-truth, and that velocity is undefined (or alternately, that space did not exist, and speed is a distance interval divided by a time interval, or as length is required to devise a clock, and also, an atomic clock could not be built, because there were no atoms!), how do we know what the expansion speed was, and so the concept of ‘inflation’ is indeterminate. “After thermalisation of at least the baryons, photons and neutrinos is complete, the standard Hot Big Bang era begins.” (p 41) I think that my ‘explanation’ is simpler and fits the facts better, also it was derived from the “first principles” of logic, and logic exists in all of the universes, considered here.’
(13) The Rule of Life is that evolution acts as a logical computer with untold numbers of iterations and life evolved because it could and we are ‘players’ evolving a future, but one (general) rule is that each step is forward and there is no going back. Examples might be the ‘poor’ design of our eyes and the nerve that had to elongate with the giraffe’s neck.
(14) The placebo/nocebo contract is basically a set of cells, from necessity, joining together and evolving a better form of consciousness that comes out of the architecture of the brain cells and acknowledges that communication exists in a two-way direction so as to enhance the organism’s performance in a Survival of the Fittest way.
(15) This refers to the method of laying down memories in the cortex especially. I envisage short term memories/action-potential-strings being held in circular ‘strings’ of nerves, but long-term memory, viewed as an organisational problem, can only be effected by iteration until an ‘adequate’ close fit is achieved. There are about 4 chapters outlining this and is necessary for creativity, in my opinion.
(16) ‘How the Mid-Victorians Worked, Ate and Died’ by Paul Clayton and Judith Rowbotham shows that, discounting the first 5 years, the mid-Victorians lived as long as we do, without modern medicine and that they died of infectious diseased and not the lifestyle ‘diseases’ that are common today. Their paper was invaluable in defining targets/points-of-interest in aligning the body, mind and lifestyle.
(17) I believe that there are three interdependent Laws of Life that can be usefully used to describe the interaction of world O and world P and may have evoked the Trinity in the pre-mathematics era of the Bible (see chapter 1). Like the mathematics of concepts, the laws are ranked in relevance and the second law, quoted above, I suspect to be the Holy Spirit that has been ‘lost’ for 2,000 years, and is the environment and its interaction with people and is state of mind/exercise/nutrition. Whilst these were of very limited interest in the past, their neglect in modern times, I believe, led to the degenerative ‘diseases’ because food is easy to get without exercise and has inadvertently triggered the death orgene.
(18) Mathematics requires concepts and logic, and is, I believe a special case of the mathematics of concepts, and as above, no attempt is made to incorporate the fifth dimension in experiments, but only to use concepts as ‘outside’ of the experiment/observer. One exception that I remember is the ‘Copenhagen effect’ in quantum mechanics where the measurer ‘forces’ a determination of the wave/particle duality at the instant of recording the experiment, but before reading the result. The break-down occurs in relativity etc., as discussed here, and further, I have shown that it is necessary in the social sciences and is fully discussed in the postscripts to the first chapters.
(19) Evolution from an organizational viewpoint shows non-logical practices that are necessary for the species but disadvantage the individuals. These practices should be genetic, but the Rule of Life means that organisms had to evolve another way and one of particular interest is the death orgene that uses ‘organization’ to kill off the old in order that the young should live to breed (in long-lived species). The older members (females) of the tribe are better/more-experienced and more likely to survive but also more likely to inflict birth defects. There seems to be no reason that we can’t extend lifetimes significantly using state of mind/exercise/nutrition in the correct way, and anti ageing is the major theme of this book.
(20) Survival of the Best is discussed in four chapters that have not been put up because I have been too busy and they are not necessary until someone wants to decide on the Best. I can only offer solutions based on evolution (as a biocomputer) as a way of setting up the mathematics of concepts, but it requires discussion/decision that lies in the future and I believe that a goal must be set, and that that is sufficient at the moment.
(21) The Logic of the Half-truth is: true, false, true part of the time and false the rest of the time, both true and false at the same time (chaos). This is an extension of logic to create a reality by making it continuous and complete. It is necessary to decide among the attractors of the Mathematics of the Mind and the most important is mathematics that is defined as a Truth because it is based on building logically from a few basic assumptions (at least that is the aim).
darrylpenney 